Chapter 14 - THROW OUT THE TRASH

​

COPYRIGHT © 2021, By Jonathan P. Volkel

​

​

​

​

    The transferring of energy from one piece of matter to the next by direct matter to matter physical  contact can explain all the scientific data that exists for the movement of energy. The presence of the ether provides the scientifically law abiding explanations for the mechanical motion of “electromagnetic” waves through outer space. It explains the patterns of motion that move by propagation which have been given names such as “light” and “gravity”. The presence of the ether completely invalidates and erases the need for ALL of the theoretical mass-less waves, particles and forces. Combining the existence of the ether with a strict adherence to the Laws of Motion not only explains everything that has already been observed and measured, but it can also explain everything else that we may not yet understand. It must, because it is the reality of the universe we live in. THE ETHER ABSOLUTELY DOES EXIST.

​

      If another theory denies the existence of the ether, then something is wrong with that theory, because propagation of motion through a medium (a.k.a. mechanical waves) is a fact and not a theory. The concept is based upon proven scientific laws, experimental evidence and simple everyday observations. It is an undeniable observable fact that propagation through objects made of matter is the only way that energy moves back and forth in the world that we can see all around us and can easily verify. It is also how energy MUST move through the depths of outer space and in the microscopic world of the atoms and their components. In fact, things function as they do in the large scale macro world that we can easily see only because it is happening the exact same way in the microscopic atomic world that we cannot see.

​

      In Chapter 2 it was shown how one of the more impossible theories, time dilation, was false. Some can argue all they want and say that certain data “proves” that time dilation is real. What that simply means is that they are misinterpreting the data. Keep this in mind. It is EASY to use the known laws of science to conclusively PROVE that time dilation cannot and does not exist. In fact, an even closer examination of the theory is made in the Analysis topic “Time Dilation 2”. That examination demonstrates even further how completely invalid the theory of time dilation is.

​

     Because time dilation is completely invalid, that by itself causes all of Einstein's theories to fall apart. Since Einstein's theories are thereby proven wrong, and if one is convinced that this explanation is also wrong, then, what is the right explanation? Don't disbelieve this simply because the Theory of Relativity has been so widely accepted. Forget the theories that are impossible to prove. Stick to the verifiable laws. Belief in the theories is causing science to continuously misinterpret the data in order to force that data to fit into the theory. There are many more examples of how the theories are contaminating the interpretation of scientific experiments and causing the data to be misunderstood, and a few examples of that are addressed here.

​

     Time dilation is not only incorrect, but it is also a completely irrational theory. Belief in it cripples ones perception of all of reality. Thinking that the progress and flow of time is something that can be altered is not scientific at all. It is a conclusion that is not founded upon known and proven scientific principles. Acceptance of time dilation creates the mindset that other scientific laws and realities can also be ignored as well.

​

     With only a little bit of thought and common sense, it is easy to see how impossible the concept of manipulating Time is. Consider any length of time. Divide that in half. Keep doing that over and over. How many times can you do that until you have a segment of time so small that it can’t be divided in half any further? There is no limit. No matter how small a segment of time you can conceive of, it can always be divided in half. As such, there is no infinitesimally small segment of time that you could point to and say “That is the smallest possible time increment in the universe”.

​

      Time is a unified and homogeneous component of the universe that steadily and constantly indicates the continuation of existence. It is the perpetual recurrence of “now”. There is no way to speed it up or slow it down. “Existing”, “being” or “now” cannot be sped up, slowed down, or altered in any way. It can’t be stretched or stopped.  Just like intangible space, time is not an “object” that can be manipulated. The only two constant, infinite, untouchable and unchangeable things in the universe, Time and Space, became the centerpiece of a theory. The “Space-time” theory teaches that both can be combined and altered. And, as if brainwashed, the scientific world accepted it.

​

       Scientists accept time dilation without having any explanation whatsoever as to what time or motion are “made of”, and how those two “objects” are able to interact with one another. Equipped with this “permission slip” to avoid explanations, they repeated the same type of error with gravity. To think that space can be bent by gravity is as ridiculous and outrageous an idea as the idea that time can be altered by simply altering your rate of motion. And so, without having any credible explanation whatsoever as to what gravity and space are “made of” or the mechanism by which they can interact with one another, scientists use their time dilation mentality to boldly make the impossible claim that gravity somehow has the ability to bend space.

​

      The confident and persistent violation of scientific laws during the past century has caused science to mutate in such a way as to result in the accidental creation of two different categories of science. The first is the category of the scientific laws. These are all the causes and effects that are provable, measurable, clearly defined and easily understood. They work the same way each and every time and the laws that define them are experimentally proven and flawlessly consistent. They never fail and are easily verified.

 

     The second category is that of the scientific theories. These are assumptions made about things we don't understand. When the theory doesn't quite explain the observed effects, formulas are invented to try and force the theory to be true. When that proves too difficult or impossible, new theories are created to explain why the first theory doesn't quite work. Somehow, science has gotten the idea that it is acceptable to build an entire belief system comprised solely of unproven theories which are built upon even more unproven theories. Doing so is not acceptable. Such a practice falls more into the category of a cult religion’s mentality instead of a scientific search for truth built upon a foundation of verifiable facts. As a result, the combination of Einstein’s and Bohr’s impossible theories have left all of humanity the impossible task of trying to make sense of what is known today as the “Philosophy of Physics”.

​

     The Theory of Relativity and all the interconnected unprovable theories related to it are all linked together by one initial assumption. That assumption is that energy can disconnect from matter and travel through space as a ghost-like mass-less wave or particle. It can travel through space without needing any sort of medium to propagate through. It self-propagates. Then, upon coming into contact with matter, it is able to cause changes in the matter’s existing state of motion. As such, these mass-less waves and particles are declared to be mass-less forces.

​

      As seen herein, it should be obvious that such a belief about energy is completely incorrect and violates all the known and observable behaviors of energy in motion. Newton’s second law of motion defines a force: F = ma. A force is a mass in motion. That is, there is no such thing as a mass-less force. As such, all the Relativity theories and quantum theories are completely wrong. Nevertheless, science believes Relativity and quantum theory to be true, and has come to conclusions about data accumulated by scientific experiments according to those beliefs.

 

     It is the belief in mass-less particles and forces that empowers the existence of something known as “The Standard Table of Elemental Particles”. It describes the belief in all the theoretical sub-atomic components which, when assembled, form the atom. The Standard Table of Elemental Particles includes the description of four different types of mass-less particles, known as “bosons”. The reason these particles were invented was because science believed that the forces which hold an atom together and keep it from flying apart originate from within the atom itself. They needed to come up with some sort of explanation as to what those forces could be and how they could function. The behavior of these imagined particles essentially describes how the proven scientific laws can be violated and ignored.

​

      Science fails to realize, and does not believe, that the ether exists. If they saw this simple truth, then they would realize that the force which holds the atom together does NOT originate from within the atom. That force actually comes from outside the atom. The ether affects atoms submerged in it in a way similar to how water affects air submerged in it. Air bubbles are not held together by internal forces, and neither are atoms. As such, the Standard Table of Elemental Particles is completely wrong and totally backwards because its creation was based upon a completely wrong initial assumption.

​

     Despite the seeming confidence of scientists about mass-less forces, mass-less particles, and the Standard Table of Elemental Particles, they obviously still possess a great deal of uncertainty about it. A video was made of the great “discovery” of one of those particles; the Higgs boson (the god particle). The scientists at a particle collider recorded a collision of sub-atomic particles and watched the “sparks” fly. They studied the image of all the different sparks that were created by that collision and somehow decided that one of them was the Higgs boson.  At a big conference, they showed the picture of the sparks to a room full of scientists and said “We think we found the Higgs boson. This one is it. What do you all think?” They all looked at one another, shrugged, and then applauded.

​

     Scientists at the particle colliders subject atoms to high powered electricity. They believe that this causes a positively charged proton to separate from an atom. They then create a pulsating magnetic current which they believe pushes the proton faster and faster, to near light speeds, around a circular path. Then they think they cause it to collide with another proton moving in the opposite direction. They believe the high speed collision results in the protons being smashed into mass-less energy particles. They think it is those mass-less energy particles that show up as “sparks” of various colored light on the monitors. Those multi colored sparks of light flash across the screen like a shooting star. After the briefest of moments, they vanish, never to be seen again.

​

     In reality, they are not separating protons from atoms. The magnetic pulses are merely creating a high speed ether wind. The photons in the pathway of the magnetic pulses have their normal and random light speed back-and-forth vibrations (very high frequency) transformed into high speed directional motion (very low frequency) by the magnetic pulses. When two high speed ether currents travelling in opposite directions collide, they lose their low frequency directional motion and return to random high frequency back-and-forth vibration motion. As their frequency of vibrating motion increases back to their original pattern of motion, their vibration frequency passes through the range of visible light.

​

      For a brief moment, they appear as sparks on the monitors. The photons caught in those artificially created magnetic ether currents momentarily take on the same frequencies that exist all the time in the Aurora Borealis. As a result, and at great expense, scientists are creating brief flashes of light in the particle collider identical to what one can continuously see for free near the Polar Regions. The bad theories are causing the scientists to completely misunderstand what is really going on. This results in their imaginations running wild as they try and interpret the observed flashes of light and then create explanations which force those observations to conform to their theories.

​

     The worst part about the particle accelerator is the part that is really scary. Based upon their theories of what the accelerator would do, they initially believed that there was a real risk that they might accidentally create a Black Hole and damage, if not destroy, the Earth. They evaluated the risk and decided; "What the heck. Let's run the accelerator anyway." Of course, there was no Black Hole because their theories are completely wrong and there is no such thing as a Black Hole, but that's not the point. The point is; they didn't know that! Sooner or later, their lack of understanding on how the universe works might actually create a real problem, and they will blindly walk right into it. In fact, they are doing that very type of thing right now. Exactly how and why will be explained near the end of this chapter.

​

     Consider the concept of “a particle of energy with no mass”. In your imagination, “zoom in” on the ether for a closer “look”. Look at two adjacent objects made of matter (photons). With your mind’s eye, zoom in even closer. Look at the empty space between them. What do you “see”? Nothing is there. Even light does not exist there. Light is a specific pattern of matter in motion. It only exists because many photons collide with one another and transfer the energy contained within them from one to the other.

​

      Scientists believe that there exists a mass-less particle of energy that can somehow occupy the void of empty space, separate and apart from matter. What is it made of? What holds it together? What kind of energy is it? Science has no provable answers to these questions. Their belief is not a concept based on actual science. It is not even based on a foundation of understanding what “energy” actually is. In simplest terms, they believe in ghosts.

​

     And what of that empty space between photons?  What is the so called “fabric of space” made of? Obviously, it isn’t made of anything. It is just empty space. And yet, it is believed that this void can be bent or stretched somehow. By what force is this possible? They believe that gravity does this. In fact, that belief led to the belief that space itself can also cease to exist. Science even believes that mass-less energy even has the ability to cause space to come into existence.

​

     Just as it is with Time, Space is not an object that can be altered. The energy that causes gravity is no different than that of light. It does not exist in the empty spaces between particles. Gravity is a steady stream of photons emitted from atomic components that moves in a straight line (matter in motion). It only travels through space because one photon moves and bumps into another one. Upon colliding, the pattern of photon motion that we call gravity transfers from one particle to the next through space. When those photons collide with atoms, the atoms move too. The basics of how it works are described in Chapter 12 “The Smallest Picture”.

​

     Gravity is given the credit for creating Black Holes. Black holes are an inevitable extension of the theoretical gravitational concepts proposed by Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity. The belief in Black Holes stems from the theories on what gravity is and how it interacts with space.

​

      Black Holes are as equally impossible as mass-less particles. The main component actually responsible for gravity is the ether. It surrounds and squeezes all the atoms. It is the source of the center seeking effect that fuels gravity. And, just as an air bubble’s size is determined by the surrounding water pressure, so too, the distance between atoms is determined by the surrounding ether pressure. In addition to that limitation, no two distinct pieces of matter can occupy the same space at the same time. And so, if photons are inserted into an atom by the pattern of gravity motion, then an equal number of photons must also come out of that atom. The concept of a Black Hole totally defies the laws of nature.

​

      Because scientists do not know what the Unified Force is, they do not understand that the only difference between one type of energy and another is its pattern of motion. Excessive gravitational energy input into a mass does not result in a Black Hole, where everything is sucked into a “singularity” from which nothing can ever escape. Instead, gravity input must result in an equivalent quantity of energy output. However, that energy emerges with a pattern of photon motion that is different than that of gravity’s pattern of photon motion. Atoms transform the pattern of photon gravity motion into different energy patterns of photon motion, such as heat and light.

​

     Without a proper understanding of gravity or a belief in the ether, scientists had to stretch their imaginations and develop more wild theories in an attempt to try and explain why a star is so hot and bright. They decided that it must be caused by nuclear fusion. They theorized that a star must be made of Hydrogen. It is the fusion of Hydrogen into Helium which gives off the heat and light. And, when all of the fuel is eventually gone, the star collapses into a Black Hole. 

​

     That theory is completely wrong. In reality, the only major difference between a star and the average planet is the quantity of mass. The huge quantity of extra mass possessed by stars results in a proportionate amount of extra gravity. The extra gravity results in a proportionate increase in pressure within the core of the star. The extra pressure creates extra heat within the core. The extra heat is so extreme, that it can transform rock into a gas. However, the extremely high pressure in the star’s core forces the gaseous rock to condense into a super heated liquid.

​

      The pressure from gravity input into the core of the star builds and builds, like a pressure cooker. When the pressure builds high enough, the “pressure cooker” blows. Huge quantities of super heated liquid erupt to the surface of the star. Once there, the molten rock instantly releases all the extra heat into the star’s atmosphere and into space. The release of all of that extra energy allows the liquid to stabilize as very hot molten rock. As a result, the entire surface of the star is liquid rock, which has temperatures in the tens of thousands of degrees, whereas the upper atmosphere of the star has temperatures in the tens of millions of degrees.

​

      Our Sun is actually one giant ball of liquid elements with a super heated atmosphere. As new molten liquids erupt from the core and settle on the surface, the rest of the upper liquids sink down to fill the inner gaps created by the eruption. As such, the liquid substance of the Sun perpetually circulates from the core to the surface, then back down to the core again.

 

     And so, the energy of motion goes into a star as gravity (linear straight line motion). The same amount of the energy of motion comes out again as heat and light (high frequency back and forth motion). What goes in must also come out. The fuel for stars is not Hydrogen. It is gravity. And the fuel for gravity is the ether. As long as the ether exists, a star will never “burn out”. A star does NOT function as some sort of fusion reactor. It’s functioning is more like that of an air conditioner. It uses pressure to move heat from one location (the star’s core) to another location (the star’s surface and outer space).

  

     What about the theories of Dark Matter and Dark Energy? This is an interesting topic worthy of greater explanation. However, it is too involved to go into detail about it here. In general, science realizes that there are many effects going on out there in space that they can't explain. As a result of so many unexplained anomalies existing all around us, it was calculated that almost 85% of all matter in the universe is invisible and undetectable by us. They have named this invisible matter “Dark Matter”, and have ascribed its motion to be caused by “Dark Energy”. They consider the discovery and identification of Dark Matter and Dark Energy to be a very high priority.

 

    The invisible matter that they detect is actually the countless tiny sub-atomic photons that fill the ether. Over a century ago, scientists believed in that matter and named it “The Lumineferous Aether”. Today, backwards theories have resulted in “light” becoming “dark”, spawning names like “Dark Matter” and “Dark Energy”. Without the knowledge of the ether, one can only imagine the types of theories that would eventually evolve in order to try and explain the ensuing effects of photon collisions and ether currents. Two of the greatest mysteries of modern science are solved by the understanding that the ether exists. 

      

     The most horrific theoretical guess of all is “The Big Bang Theory” (the theory, not the comedy show). We see this theory mentioned on television all the time. We watch scientists telling us confidently exactly how it all happened, as if it was a proven fact. They base its occurrence on a scenario where initially no time or space existed, and a super powerfully charged particle from who knows where came here and exploded. Its vast internal energy disbursed into space. These “energies” somehow coalesced into matter and here we are. And it all happened about 14 billion years ago.

​

     No such thing as time existing? There has never been a more ridiculous statement than that. No space existing? Equally ridiculous! If space didn’t exist, then what remains: Non-existence?  An explosion released energy that coalesced? Energy is able to coalesce… into matter!?  What is that? What kind of energy? What is it made of?  Can an example of that happening in the real world be demonstrated in any way? Did the people who invented this theory even know what an explosion is? Do they know what energy actually is?

​

     The impossible workings of the Big Bang Theory are discussed in greater depth in the Analysis topic “The Energy of Motion”. Essentially, every imagined cause and effect that scientists use to try and make the Big Bang Theory seem plausible totally defies the laws of science and reality. For example, they believe that our universe is expanding outward from some central point due to the Big Bang explosion. And yet, they have to simultaneously ignore that motion and create magical forces and effects to explain how an outward explosion also resulted in the spinning of all of the galaxies and their contents. Belief in the Big Bang Theory is the equivalent of believing that magic is real.

​

​

THE GREENHOUSE GAS THEORY

​

     Although there are so many incorrect theories that exist which are accepted as facts, there is only one more bad theory that will be discussed in this category of “Throw out the trash”. It is perhaps the biggest topic of the day and so it should be addressed. The bad theory is associated with the arrival of global warming.

​

     The Earth’s temperature seems to be steadily increasing, year after year, in a pattern referred to as “global warming”. What the temperature is actually doing is not a theory. The reason WHY it is happening is the breeding ground for bad theories. Some scientists believe that global warming is caused by the effects described in the Greenhouse Gas Theory.

​

      Essentially the theory boils down to this. Carbon emissions created by industrialization cause Carbon atoms to become part of the atmosphere. The ever increasing emissions cause an excessive quantity of Carbon to be incorporated into the atmosphere to a degree which hadn’t existed prior to the industrial revolution. As such, these extra Carbon atoms in the air are trapping more and more heat. They reflect the infrared heat that rises from the Earth and send it back down to the Earth. And slowly but surely, the temperature steadily increases. The more Carbon trapped in the atmosphere, the quicker the heat builds up. That about sums it up: Right? Well…not exactly.

​

     Actually, there’s more to the Greenhouse Gas Theory than just Carbon emissions. In order to fight global warming, the world’s attention does seem to be focused solely on reducing Carbon emissions. However, scientists classify several different gases as being Greenhouse Gases. They believe the three gases that have the most influence on global temperatures are Carbon, methane and water vapor.

​

     There’s not much anyone can do about the water vapor in our atmosphere (nor should we try). But, where is all the methane coming from? Methane is composed of one Carbon atom combined with four Hydrogen atoms. Methane is the main ingredient of natural gas. The majority of methane is created by single celled organisms which break down organic matter. They can also cause larger animals, such as cows and chickens, to produce methane. Since the population of the world has increased, then the need for food has increased. Increased quantities of livestock result in increased methane production.

​

      Scientists believe that all of the different greenhouse gases contribute in sending the heat that rises from the Earth back down again. In other words, scientists want us to believe that heat does not just rise anymore. Instead, they want us to believe that heat also travels down.

​

     After reading this paper and understanding how the system really works, it should become apparent that  heat doesn’t bounce off of anything. All energy, including heat, gets absorbed by atoms and is then transferred to other nearby atoms. Also, it is EVERY type of atom that does this. In which direction does the energy get transferred? All atoms will send their excess energy in EVERY direction.

​

     An example that will help to visualize how and why atoms always send their energy in every direction is to compare it to the behavior of a pool of water. An object dropped into that pool of water will create waves that move away from the object in every direction. It is impossible to drop an object into the water and have waves move away in only one direction.

​

     Any energy, including heat energy, is simply mass in motion. Newton’s second law of motion defines a mass in motion as being a force (F = ma). Newton’s first law of motion reveals that when a force makes contact with any object, that object will experience a change in its existing state of motion.

​

     When a Carbon atom (an object) is struck by an infrared wave (a force), it changes (increases) its state of motion. All Carbon atoms in our atmosphere are completely surrounded by a “pool” of other atoms.  Just like ripples in a pool of water, the Carbon atom will transfer its heightened motion (caused by the application of heat) in all directions to all the atoms that surround it.

​

    If that energy is sent to an area that restricts motion (it’s too crowded with other atoms), then the energy will be sent right back to that same atom again. As a result, energy will end up moving towards an area that has less opposition to motion. The atoms possessing the heightened motion move towards the area that provides more room to move around in.

​

     The energized atoms will try to push other atoms that are blocking its motion out of the way. If the slower atoms are too numerous and cannot move out of the way, the more energized atom will get pushed back by them to an area where there is more room. Atoms possessing less energy (less motion) do not and cannot move to an area possessing more energy (more motion). When it comes to heat, the location of the most unrestricted movement is in outer space. If not for gravity’s hold, heated air would keep on rising until it reached the wide open area of atom free outer space. That is why all heat rises.

​

     Another example that aids in understanding how heated particles behave in the atmosphere and why heat always rises is to compare it to another process that is easily demonstrated. This example also uses a body of water to aid in understanding. Just like the air, a body of water is also a medium of propagation that moves. It serves as a good example because we can easily see what happens in water with the naked eye. In this case, the way that heated particles behave in the atmosphere is the same way that air behaves when it is submerged under water.

​

     There is more to understanding the movement of heat than just the analysis of a single object’s motion. Other forces and the motion of other nearby objects must also be taken into consideration. Gravity is a second force that plays a big part in affecting the movement of objects. Gravity causes atoms to move towards one another. The stronger the gravity is, the more crowded the atoms will be. The effect of gravity on water aids in understanding the effect of gravity on the atmosphere and the motion of heat in the atmosphere.

​

     Thanks to gravity, water pressure continually increases the deeper down into the water you go. Air is much less dense than water, and so possesses less pressure than water. Any air submerged under water is completely surrounded by the water and gets squeezed by the greater water pressure from all directions, forming the air into a bubble. However, since gravity causes the water pressure at the bottom of a submerged air pocket to be greater than the water pressure at the top of the air pocket, the submerged air will get squeezed more at the bottom. This causes the submerged air to continually rise. Underwater air bubbles ALWAYS rise! We have seen this happen countless times with our own eyes and we know that it ALWAYS works this way.

​

     Thanks to gravity, atmospheric air pressure also continually increases the closer and closer you get to the ground. Heated air particles attain increased energy, and therefore increased movement, requiring more space for them to move around in. This results in there being less air particles per cubic inch of space. This means that the air pressure of the heated air is decreased. This causes the greater surrounding air pressure to squeeze it. Since gravity causes the surrounding air pressure to always be greater at the bottom, the warm air will get squeezed upward. It will continue to rise until it reaches a level where all the surrounding pressure is equal to its own pressure. After shedding its heat into space, its energy decreases and therefore its motion decreases. It contracts, taking up less space. Now having more particles per cubic inch, its pressure rises, causing it to sink back down to an atmospheric level equal to its own pressure.

​

     To think that rising heat could turn around and travel back down again is similar to thinking that air bubbles rising in a fish tank could reverse direction and head back down again. Even if you put a lid on top of the tank, it is incorrect to think that, once enough bubbles accumulate at the top, or if you change the type of air being inserted, or if you change the composition of the lid, newly arriving bubbles will then start to turn around and head down again. Instead, pressure will build at the top until the lid blows off.

​

     Heat is transferred by direct atom to atom physical contact. If some heated atmospheric atoms transfer their heat to atoms below them, then those lower atoms will experience increased motion. Their effective pressure will drop, and they will immediately be pushed upward by the greater pressure of the lower atmosphere, carrying the heat with them. In other words, heat can’t travel down too far or for very long. Gravity will not allow it.

​

      Even if one completely ignores the effects that air pressure has on heated particles and still insists on believing that greenhouse gas atoms are somehow able to reflect heat back down to Earth, then realize that such a belief creates another contradiction. Whatever the greenhouse gases are doing with the energy that rises up from the Earth, they must also be doing the same thing with the energy that comes down from the Sun. In other words, those very same greenhouse gases that are supposedly reflecting energy back down to Earth must also be reflecting the Sun’s energy back out into space. It balances out, resulting in zero energy imbalance. Why would it and how could it be otherwise? How could atoms possibly work in one direction only? They can’t.

​

     Also, if greenhouse gases in the upper atmosphere were actually able to reflect heat and send the heat back down, then that heat would have to pass through the rest of the non-greenhouse gas atmosphere in order to reach the ground. The subsequently re-heated non-greenhouse gas air that exists between the ground and the greenhouse gases in the upper atmosphere would quickly rise, carrying the downward moving heat right back up again, long before it ever had a chance to reach the ground. The entire Greenhouse Gas Theory is so self contradictory and illogical that it doesn’t even conform to scientific laws and plain old common sense.

​

     In fact, the Greenhouse Gas Theory does not even conform to the way an actual greenhouse really works. Attaching the name “Greenhouse” to the theory implies that an actual greenhouse works because it reflects heat down. Actually, a greenhouse stays warm on the inside because it allows sunlight to come in while simultaneously preventing the heated inside air from exchanging places with the cooler outside air. If the sunlight is removed (night time), or if the greenhouse walls are removed and outside air is allowed to circulate to the inside, then the extra heat quickly disappears. Just open the windows of any regular heated house in winter to see how quickly the temperature inside the house drops. It works exactly the same with a greenhouse. A greenhouse uses sunlight to continually heat the interior air during the day. At night, a greenhouse does not reflect the existing heat back in again. It needs an extra heater to maintain warmth. Without that heater, the interior nighttime temperature of the greenhouse will drop to the same as the outside temperature.

​

     Since all atoms transmit their excess motion in every direction, then the more particles that exist in the air, the more of the Sun’s energy will get sent back out into space. As a result, an increase in greenhouse gas particles (or any extra particles in our atmosphere) should ultimately result in lower surface temperatures. In fact, large volcanic eruptions, which spew huge amounts of greenhouse gases and other particles into the atmosphere, have always resulted in ensuing colder global temperatures. Why would anyone think that so-called man-made greenhouse gases are able to have the completely opposite effect and cause global temperatures to increase?

​

     Some scientists try and argue that the frequency (wavelength) of sunlight and infrared heat are different. That is why sunlight can come in, but infrared heat can’t get out.  

​

     It is important to remember how the unified force works. There is only one energy, but there are many different patterns of energy motion. Solar radiation is one type of a high frequency pattern emitted by the Sun and is carried to us by the photons of the ether. That pattern exists in greater abundance near the Sun. As such, it moves away from the Sun and into outer space, saturating the photons of the ether with that pattern.

​

      The Earth possesses a much lower concentration of that high frequency pattern, allowing that energy to be absorbed by the atoms that make up the Earth. The atoms then transform that pattern of high frequency photon motion into a lower frequency pattern of atomic motion which we identify as “heat”. That pattern exists in high abundance on Earth but in low abundance in space. And so, that pattern of heat motion will eventually be transferred from the atoms in the upper atmosphere back to the photons and will move more freely towards outer space. This results in an effect that causes us to say “heat always rises”.

​

     One might wonder; “If heat always rises, then how is it possible that the Sun’s heat comes down to us while the Earth’s heat also rises at the same time? Isn’t heat simultaneously moving in both directions?”

​

     It is not exactly correct to say that the Sun is sending us heat. Instead, it is sending us a higher frequency RADIATION. There is a big difference between “heat” and “radiation”. Radiation consists of many tiny sub-atomic pieces of matter (photons) which, when moving as a group, have a very high speed and high frequency pattern of back and forth motion. One example of a type of that radiation is something we call “visible light”.

​

      Once that radiation strikes atoms, the collision by the tiny photons onto the much more massive atoms transforms the pattern of high frequency motion into the slower frequency pattern of atomic motion that we call “heat”. The transference of that slower pattern of motion from atom to atom is perceived by us as being the movement of “heat”. And so, the Sun’s energy does not come down to the Earth in the form of heat. It only becomes heat after the photons make contact with atoms.

​

     The high frequency pattern of photon motion being generated by the Sun ALWAYS moves away from the Sun. When that energy strikes the atoms that make up the Earth, the Earth’s atoms transform that pattern into a slower pattern of atomic motion (heat). The atoms eventually transfer that new slower pattern of atomic motion back to the photons, transforming the heat into a different type of lower frequency radiation. That slower pattern of photon motion ALWAYS moves towards outer space. And so, even though energy moves in both directions at the same time, “heat” does not. Any heat source will send out its heat in ALL directions. However, any heat that is sent back down towards the Earth will quickly turn around and start to rise. Ultimately, the net result is that all heat will rise.

​

      Remember that “energy” is simply mass in motion. Since no two objects can occupy the same space at the same time, then whatever energy (mass in motion) might move into the Earth, and equal quantity of mass in motion must simultaneously depart. The only difference between the in-going and outgoing energy is the pattern in which the mass moves. In the case of “light” and “heat”, the pattern of light energy is created by many small particles moving very fast. The pattern of heat energy is created by fewer larger particles moving more slowly. Mass and motion are inversely related, but the total energy input and output is the same.

​

     If one were to search the internet for details on the Greenhouse Gas Theory, one would discover much scientific debate on the topic of global warming. There are scientists who firmly believe in the Greenhouse Gas Theory, and others who firmly believe that it is utter nonsense. They debate back and forth in on-line forums and chat room text discussions, trying to persuade one another. They use arguments about wavelengths, absorption rates, plant biology, and so forth. All of it boils down to very detailed discussions over scientific concepts and minutiae that are either irrelevant to what is really going on, or are complete misinterpretations of the data. The truth is much simpler and more obvious than their misdirected and irrelevant micro-analysis can reveal.

​

     One scientist involved in such a debate fervently supported the Greenhouse Gas Theory. He referred to the conditions that exist on the Moon to support his position. He believed that since the Moon is our closest neighbor in space, then the effects of the Sun on it should be similar to the effects of the Sun on the Earth. However, something is causing temperatures on the Moon to be very different than temperatures on the Earth.

 

     During the Lunar day, temperatures on the Moon can exceed 260 degrees Fahrenheit. However, during the Lunar night, the temperature on the Moon will drop quickly and drastically to -200 degrees Fahrenheit. The reason this extreme drop in temperature happens is because the Moon has no water vapor or any kind of an atmosphere at all. The Earth does have an atmosphere and its temperature does not drop so drastically at night. Therefore, he believes that this proves that the Earth’s atmosphere acts like a greenhouse gas that traps heat, keeping the Earth warm at night, thereby proving that the Greenhouse Gas Theory is true.

​

      Is he telling the truth in his comparison of the Moon to the Earth? Well…sort of. Actually, he is telling a partial truth. It is indeed true that the Moon’s temperature does drop so very drastically during the Lunar night. However, he is leaving out a few major important facts in order to make it seem as if the Greenhouse Gas Theory is true. In fact, the rest of the truth that he is so obviously omitting conclusively proves that the Greenhouse Gas Theory is completely false. Can you see the holes in his argument for yourself?

​

    This chapter is all about false theories and twisted data. The Moon argument is another perfect example of the scientific deception that humanity is being subjected to. In order to be better equipped to see through science’s errors, analyze the Moon argument to try and detect the faulty reasoning. After giving the topic some thought, continue reading to see the errors revealed.

​

    Although the pro-Greenhouse Gas Theory scientist did mention that during the Lunar day, the Moon’s temperature will climb to nearly +260 degrees Fahrenheit, he completely ignored the significance of that fact. The Lunar day temperature climbs that high also because the Moon has no atmosphere. So then, why doesn’t the Earth’s daytime temperature also climb to +260 degrees? It is because the Earth does have an atmosphere.

​

     The atoms in the air collect the Sun’s energy and send it in EVERY direction. As a result, half of the Sun’s energy goes back into space, and half comes down to the surface. That is why the hottest temperatures recorded here only reach approximately +130 degrees Fahrenheit (half the Moon’s hottest temperature). This fact conclusively proves that the arguments about different wavelengths are irrelevant. The effect of the atmosphere on incoming and outgoing energy works equally in both directions no matter the wavelength!

​

      At night, the heat rising from the Earth again gets sent in all directions by the atmosphere. Half of it goes out into space, and half of it gets send back down towards the Earth again. If “down” is warmer, then it immediately rises right back up again, long before it has a chance to reach the ground. It’s sort of like “taking two steps forward and one step back”. Although the back and forth movement of heat slows down its escape, the heat does ultimately end up moving into outer space. The back and forth movement of the heat in our atmosphere is why the Earth’s surface temperature cools more slowly at night than the Moon’s does. Even so, when comparing the Earth’s nighttime surface temperatures to the Moon’s nighttime surface temperatures, it seems as if the Earth should still cool faster than it actually does. So then, why doesn’t it?

​

     Another blatantly obvious omission by the Greenhouse Gas Theory believer, and an important factor that affects the Earth’s cooling rate, is the rate at which the Earth spins. It spins much faster than the Moon. The Earth makes one complete rotation in twenty four hours. The Moon makes one complete rotation in twenty eight days. Before the Earth has a chance to cool too much, the sunlight returns and re-warms it again.

​

      There is also one other MAJOR difference between the Earth and the Moon which the Greenhouse Gas Theory supporter managed to “conveniently” neglect. The Moon has zero water, whereas two thirds of the Earth is covered in water. The pro Greenhouse Gas Theory scientist acknowledged that the Moon had no water, but only in the context of it being absent as atmospheric water vapor. He completely ignored the role that the huge bodies of water on the surface of the Earth play in atmospheric temperatures.

​

      Anyone who lives near a coastal area knows firsthand the effects that large bodies of water have on the air temperature. Hot summer days can have coastal temperatures that are noticeably cooler than inland temperatures. Cold winter days can have coastal temperatures that are noticeably warmer than inland temperatures. In other words, the temperature of a large body of water definitely has a major effect on air temperature. Additionally, anyone who lives near a large body of water knows that it could be freezing cold outside, causing all the moisture in the air to freeze and become snow, and yet the nearby lake or ocean remains unfrozen. Large bodies of water require much more time to transfer heat than water vapor in the air does.

​

     An interesting thing about the Earth’s oceans is that the Sun is not the only source of heat for them. There is a great deal of underwater volcanic activity that is constantly occurring every day under the oceans. The volcanic activity heats the water, which then rises. Cold water moves in to take the place of the rising hot water. The heated water eventually reaches the surface of the ocean and then transfers the heat into the air. From there the heat continues to rise and ends up in outer space.

​

     There are all kinds of data available on annual volcanic activity. Some of that data indicates an increase of volcanic activity by as much as five percent in the last 20 years. However, that does not necessarily mean that volcanic activity is actually increasing. It might just mean that our ability to observe and document it is continually improving. It is important to remember not to jump to any conclusions based upon that data alone. Even so, since two thirds of the surface of the Earth is covered in water, and since a large percentage of the ocean floor remains unexplored, then obviously there is a great deal of lava flowing into the bottom of the oceans that scientists are still completely unaware of. There might really be an actual increase in volcanic activity and science is completely unable to detect it and does not even realize it.

​

     Could it even be possible that the  annual quantity of volcanic eruptions is the same, but the average temperature of the lava has increased by a few degrees? If it had, would scientists even notice? There is no accurate data going back far enough in time regarding exact lava temperatures in order for science to come to any sort of a correct conclusion about increases in the annual total volcanic energy output. One thing is absolutely certain. An increase in the total annual volcanic heat output would most definitely increase the temperature of the oceans and account for global warming.

​

     The Greenhouse Gas Theory relies heavily upon Einstein’s perceptions of energy. Einstein’s theory was completely wrong. As a result, so are the impossible claims made by the Greenhouse Gas Theory. And yet, extra warming of the oceans by increased volcanic activity is a simple and easy explanation for global warming that does not require false scientific beliefs and deceptive twisting of the facts in order to make it work.

​

     But, is it possible for volcanic heat output to increase? How can it? Why would it? In order to better understand how it could be possible, one must remember that the ether exists and what the unified force is.

​

     The Earth is submerged in the ether. Any increase of energy in the ether transfers into the atoms that make up the Earth. Atoms can ultimately transform whatever pattern of increased sub-atomic motion that the ether may have into different patterns of increased atomic motion. And so, increased sub-atomic “electromagnetic” waves get transformed into increased atomic heat.

​

     Heightened energy in the ether means that the sub-atomic photons are moving faster. This means that more photons collide with the Earth’s atoms per second. This ultimately means that the spray of photons (which causes gravity to work) that emits from the spinning atoms contains more photons than usual (for a full description of how the atoms create gravity, see the Analysis topic “Sub-Atomic Motion”). As a result, the acceleration of gravity increases. When gravity increases, pressure in the core of the Earth increases. When the pressure increases, heat increases. The increased heat results in increased volcanic energy. Increased volcanic energy results in global warming.

​

     The acceleration of gravity on Earth measures at 9.8 m/s/s (32.17405 ft/s/s). Were these values exactly the same 100 years ago? Is there any way to know? For example, if the acceleration of gravity increased by one tenth of one percent to a rate of 9.81 m/s/s, would we even notice? Lava temperatures could increase because of this which would increase the heat being transferred into the bottom of the oceans. Increasing the ocean temperatures by a few degrees would also increase atmospheric temperatures and would be classified as global warming.

​

     Gravity readings on the surface of this planet are inexact and vary according to altitude, latitude and longitude, making it impossible to attain an exact measurement. None of that really matters. All that actually matters is the final cumulative force of gravity measured at the center of the Earth. There is just no way to ever know for certain what that value actually is or if it has changed at all during the last century.

​

     It is not necessary for anyone to even bother to take the time to learn the scientific and technical explanations for heat’s behavior in order to understand global warming. It is not necessary to blindly trust the theories of others. Everyone should already know for a fact from their own daily personal life experience that heat ALWAYS rises! It is why the attic is the hottest area in a house and the basement is the coolest area. It is why candle flames, match flames and campfires always point up. It is why barbecuing with Carbon rich charcoal works. It is why we put our pots and pans on top of the flames in order to cook. It is why steam rises out of a pot of boiling water. It is also why chimneys work. The concentrated Carbon emissions that saturate a chimney do not send the heat back down. The rising heat that comes from the burning of Carbon rich coal or wood carries the smoke up the chimney and out of the house. Factories usually burn coal, oil or natural gas in order to create heat and thereby create Carbon emissions. Carbon emissions end up in the upper atmosphere solely because they absorbed heat and got hot. And heat always rises.

​

    The Greenhouse Gas theory contradicts common sense and life experience. If the Carbon contained in emissions actually reflected heat back down, then those emissions would never have been able to rise up into the atmosphere in the first place. In other words, the presence of the Carbon in the atmosphere is an additional proof that the Carbon is not reflecting heat down, but is instead absorbing the heat which causes it to rise, just like the rest of the warm air around it.

​

      As the Carbon rises, it sheds the heat into the cooler surrounding environment. As it cools, the Carbon bonds with other atoms in order to regain the lost energy and stabilize. Some of the Carbon bonds with other Carbon and falls to the ground as soot. Other Carbon atoms bond with Oxygen to cause the creation of Carbon Monoxide and Carbon Dioxide. The Carbon Dioxide eventually cools and descends to a level where the plants can reach it. Plants absorb the Carbon Dioxide and incorporate the Carbon into themselves while releasing the Oxygen back into the atmosphere.  And so, the perpetual arrival and subsequent departure of Carbon into and out of our atmosphere conclusively proves that the Carbon absorbs heat (causing it to rise) and then transmits that heat upward (causing it to come down again) and does not reflect heat. The entire process results in the Carbon eventually arriving right back on the ground again.

​

      The Greenhouse gas theory is as self-contradictory as are many of science’s modern day Relativity based theories. Even to this very day, scientists still must call it a THEORY (even though some might refuse to). That is because they absolutely cannot prove that it actually works that way at all. And, they never will. That is because the theory is totally wrong. In fact, if one performed an experiment which proved that Carbon emissions did not reflect heat (like burning Carbon based fuels and watching the emissions rise), science would refuse to acknowledge their error and would still cling to the Greenhouse Gas Theory. They would say “No, the theory hasn’t been proven to be wrong. We just haven’t been able to prove that it is right yet.” They will continue to use the deceptive twisting and partial use of factual data in order to try and force the data to fit the theory.

​

     When attempting to understand the Earth’s total temperature, one must remember and take into account that the ether does exist. Think of the ether as being a vast ocean of particles in which the Earth is immersed. It is the dominant factor in determining the Earth’s average temperature.

​

     Imagine an insulated container, like a thermos. Fill that container with a hot liquid, seal it tight, and submerge it in a large body of cold water. Now imagine filling a thermos with a very cold liquid, sealing it, and placing it in a large body of hot water. In both cases, the end result will be the same. The thermos insulation only slows the process, but cannot stop the inevitable outcome. The temperature of the liquid inside the thermos will change and become equal with the temperature of the large body of water. The equalization of temperatures will happen even faster if the thermos is full of holes.

​

    So it is with the Earth immersed within the ether. Even if one believes that greenhouse gases act as an insulator, the Earth will behave just as the liquid in the thermos behaves. If the ether has less energy than the Earth has, then any temperature build up on the Earth will be quickly drained into the ether. Scattered greenhouse gases cannot insulate against that. Given even the slightest atmospheric openings in theoretical greenhouse gases (holes in the insulator), an energy buildup on the Earth will rush through the openings towards the ether in order to equalize with it.

​

     Global warming on the Earth actually indicates an excess energy buildup in the ether that surrounds the Earth. This causes energy (heat) to increase here (global warming), forcing the Earth to maintain an energy balance with the surrounding ether. Such an energy buildup in the ether can be caused by only one thing in this solar system; THE SUN.  

  

     Claims of man made global warming are based upon science’s estimations of what the Earth’s temperature should be right now. They have analyzed the Earth’s orbital patterns and its resultant distance from and orientation to the Sun. The data that they possess represents less than 1 percent of Earth’s total orbital motion (it would take over 100,000 years for Earth’s orbital variations to go full circle and begin to repeat the pattern). Using this sparse and incomplete data as a guide, they calculate that the Earth should be in a cooling period now. They acknowledge that global warming does repeatedly return in cycles, but they believe that it is too soon for this particular cycle to be occurring now. Trusting totally in their assumptions and predictions about Earth’s movements, and lacking any other insight as to why the Earth is warming, they jump to the irrational conclusion that the cause for the supposedly premature heat is a man made one.

​

     Scientists fail to look at the bigger picture for the source of the warming. They fail to analyze changes in the Sun’s motion as being a potential cause. All of the planets in our solar system have an effect not only on the motion of the Earth, but also upon the motion of the Sun. Approximately once every 500 years, the majority of the planets are in alignment. That is, they are positioned on the same side of the Sun. When this happens, their combined mass shifts the center of gravity within the Sun to being slightly off-center. This causes the Sun to wobble around that off-center point.

​

     500 years later, the planets align again, but this time they do it on a different side of the Sun. This causes the Sun to wobble more in that direction. In effect, the planets cause the Sun to rock back and forth. This rocking of the Sun causes it to release a little more energy than usual and the effects can last for quite a while. In fact, the waxing and waning of the Sun’s energy release due to the back and forth wobble takes about 1,000 years. This surge of energy saturates the ether in our vicinity for centuries and results in the Earth acquiring more solar energy than usual. The unified force allows for that energy to manifest as extra heat here on Earth. Apparently, scientists have not taken the Sun’s motion into account at all when determining what our planetary temperature should be.

​

     The following charts represent planetary temperatures over a period of time. The first chart depicts temperatures over the past 425,000 years. The first chart is, of course, absurd. There is no way we could know what the Earth’s temperatures actually were beyond recorded human history. What that chart does reveal is that the people who created it acknowledge that there is a cyclic pattern to the Earth’s temperatures. The other two charts depict temperature changes over a more reasonable time span.  The one thing they all have in common is that they all agree that there is definitely a pattern of repeating global warming temperature cycles.

​