Chapter 13 - OSCILLATION
COPYRIGHT © 2017, By Jonathan P. Volkel
Now draw your attention up from the deepest depths of the ether back into the atomic level. There are two particular effects created by configurations of atoms that will be examined in this chapter. These two particular effects are responsible for some very interesting resultant behavior. In both cases, the response is caused by oscillation. It will be shown what causes it, what its effects are on the system, and what the results are.
In Chapter 6 “The Electron and Magnetism”, the concept of magnetism was discussed in the context which stated that magnetism originated from the electron. That explanation for magnetism was only partially true. At that point in the discussion, most readers were of the mindset that the Bohr model of the atom was the correct model. The full causes for magnetism could not be discussed at that time without first revealing the correct model of the atom. That didn’t happen until chapter 9. Now that you know that all the atomic components are connected to one another in a long line, the more complete picture of exactly why magnetism happens can be shown.
If you were to research the current theories on what magnetism is and how and why it works, you would encounter some very complicated explanations. Even the reasons for why opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel can get into some pretty complicated mathematical analysis. However, the actual way that magnetism works is astonishingly simple and requires no mathematical skills to understand it.
Perhaps the best example to illustrate it with is to compare it to a whip. When you crack the whip, the motion starts at your hand and travels down the length of the whip to the far end. The two concepts in this that apply to the atom are these. First, the motion of your wrist is magnified as it travels down the length of the whip. Second, motion travels in only one direction. That’s it. That is exactly why magnetism works.
Surges of energy entering atoms or imbalances in the makeup of atoms can cause the entire line of atomic components to oscillate. The first neutron in the line can oscillate a little. The next will move up and down a little more. Each component in the line causes the up and down motion to increase. By the time the motion reaches the end of the line, it is a big bounce. The energy source that feeds these bounces and makes each successive one larger than the previous one is the ether. In the case of magnetism, the bounce doesn’t initiate at the first neutron. It begins somewhere further along the line, closer to the electron.
The direction of motion travels straight out of the end of the line. Like a surfer riding a wave, photons are pushed in the direction of that wave of motion.
The above picture illustrates the concept. The wave on the top left represents an oscillating atom. The first neutron affected in that atom would be at the far left. The electron is at the end of the line on the far right of that wave. The motion of that rippling wave moves from left to right and it pushes photons along as it goes. The moving photons are represented by the red lines.
To the right of the upper illustrated wave is another wave. It represents a second atom that is also oscillating. Because that second atom is also oscillating, it gets hit by most of the photons that were pushed by the first wave. The bottom pair of images compares an oscillating atom to one that is not oscillating. In this case, most of the oscillating energy misses the second atom.
This demonstrates why items that emit magnetism also respond to magnetism. This is also the reason why many elements do not respond to magnetism. They are stable and do not oscillate. Even atoms that are stable and do not continuously oscillate can experience a momentary oscillation bounce if subjected to a sudden high input of energy. This is why magnetism is always associated with electricity. Electricity is a very high and sudden input of motion into an atom. When it enters a stable atom, such as Copper, it causes a momentary oscillation bounce in the Copper’s atomic line of components, causing the Copper to emit magnetism. Some of electricity’s motion is used to create the oscillation motion. Thus, the greater the magnetic burst, the less energy is left over for electrical power.
When creating a magnet, such as a bar magnet, we must heat some iron, hammer it and align it to the North. This establishes a one way flow of motion through the iron. The exact details of how and why this happens is explained and demonstrated in the Analysis topic “Magnetic Fields”. For now, just realize that doing so creates an ether current that flows through the bar magnet in only one direction. Armed with this knowledge, it becomes simple to understand why opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel.
If we create two such bar magnets and label them so that the end that has the current flowing into the magnet is labeled “S” (south), and the end that the current emerges from is labeled “N” (north), it becomes easy to see why magnets behave as they do.
The above image shows all the possible combinations of arranging bar magnet ends. In the case of aligning opposite polarities, it is easy to see why they match up. The ether current flowing through each is going in the same direction. The currents merge into one larger current when the two magnets come close enough together. Magnetism causes the two magnets to move towards one another. The merging of the two currents enhances the effect and helps hold them together.
When identical polarities are matched up, the magnets cannot move closer together. This is easily seen in the N+N match-up. The currents are flowing right at one another and even push away from one another. The motion of the photons in the ether causes the repelling effect. With the S+S match-up, it is not so easy to see why currents flowing away from one another would repel. The Analysis topic “Magnetic Fields” shows exactly why.
That’s all there is to it. There are no fictional “fields” that somehow radiate mass-less waves of energy that somehow attract or repel one another. One does not need to know Quantum math in order to understand magnetism. All one needs is to simply understand that the ether exists. It is made of tiny particles of matter that move. Just like anything else in this world, they move in one direction at a time. Most of the time, their motion is random. Sometimes, their motion can be organized. The oscillations in atoms create a pattern of motion that results in a massive migration of motion like that which happens during rush hour on a one way highway.
At the start of this chapter it was stated that there were two specific effects that would be addressed relating to oscillation. The first was magnetism. The second effect is a big one. The biggest that we know of. The nuclear bomb!
Apparently, scientists don’t really know what an explosion is. They understand that it is the release of energy in all directions simultaneously. But what kind of energy? Science apparently thinks that there are different kinds of energy. They believe that heat energy, chemical energy, atomic energy, gravity, magnetism and motion energy are all different. That is why they sought “The Unifying Force”. They believed that one force would somehow tie all of these together. They failed to realize that all of these energies are simply “inertia in motion at different frequencies”.
They seem to think that the cause of the explosion in an atomic bomb is the splitting of an atom (the breaking of a single atom into pieces) which thereby releases hidden atomic energies (whatever that may be) buried within the atom. Perhaps the neutrons themselves are shattered releasing the strong atomic forces contained within. By now you realize it is none of those things. An explosion is caused by oscillation, and scientists have figured out ways to artificially induce it without actually realizing that they were doing it.
First lets look at exactly what an explosion is. As an example, we will look at a commonplace explosion triggered by gunpowder. Gunpowder burns and burns very fast. What does “ burning” mean? It is the release of heat. Heat is the domain of the proton. The process starts with the insertion of inertia (via a match flame or a spark) into an already unstable compound (gunpowder). The reason it is unstable is because it is already running at maximum capacity. The infusion of extra energy into an unstable compound immediately throws its spinning motion out of balance. The protons leap slightly above "the line" because of a sudden infusion of extra inertia. In other words, they experience an oscillation bounce.
When an atomic component sweeps through the ether because of an oscillation bounce, it comes into contact with more photons per second, allowing it to absorb more energy per second than under normal circumstances. Not only does it pass the energy of the original spark onto the next atomic component, but it also passes on the extra energy absorbed from the ether. As a result, the next atomic component bounces higher than the previous one. In doing so, it absorbs even more energy from the ether and passes this on to the next component.
With each atomic component affected, the energy grows. Other atoms connected to the first atom receive this heightened inertia and they do the same thing. The effect propagates throughout the entire quantity of gunpowder, getting more pronounced with each molecule the energy interacts with. Remember that the transfer of inertia is instantaneous. As a result the propagation of the effect is very fast and grows more intense with each molecule of gunpowder that is affected (the more the gunpowder, the bigger the blast). When the effect finally reaches the last atom in the line, all of the energy previously absorbed from the ether is released back into the ether in an instantaneous burst. BOOM!
Although the overall principle is exactly the same with an atomic bomb, the unique characteristics of the Plutonium cause more drastic results. As mentioned earlier when radioactive decay was discussed, Plutonium possesses atomic components that extend outwards far away from the center of mass. The extreme distance from the center causes the last neutron to possess an orbital speed that far exceeds its “normal” rate of speed proportionate to its large mass. This means that it possesses an overabundance of energy.
The energy level of the ether requires that this excess energy be “spread around”. As a result, some of this extra energy flows into the nearby protons and electrons, causing them to orbit around the neutron faster. As a result, they shed the extra energy input by emitting radiation and heat. The rest of the energy causes the outermost neutrons to gain an oscillating bounce, allowing the energy to be spread out over a wider area of the ether in the same amount of time.
With gunpowder, an extra “spark” of inertia is needed in order to create the oscillating bounce and trigger the energy absorption reaction. With Plutonium, the oscillation exists naturally and continuously in the outermost neutrons. It is the excessive speed of the outermost neutrons that causes them to possess more motion than the surrounding ether and provides the energy for the continuous emission of radiation and heat from the electrons and protons. It is this excessive orbital energy that causes the extra oscillation motion so that, rather than absorbing energy from the ether, the excess orbital energy in the neutron can be relocated into the ether even faster because of the oscillation. This allows the oscillation to continue and the excess energy to be released slowly and steadily without the need of an explosion.
In order to trigger a nuclear explosion, a conventional explosion is triggered around the Plutonium. The frequency of that explosion is compatible with the slower moving neutrons near the center of the Plutonium. Those neutrons absorb the energy from that explosion. This infusion of energy causes those innermost neutrons to gain an oscillating bounce. For this situation, think of the Plutonium atom like a very long whip.
When the inertia from the conventional explosion is absorbed by the neutrons near the core, they become filled with inertia and bounce above the level plane. This is like cocking back the whip. Those neutrons were stable. They did not originally oscillate and do not "want" to oscillate. They not only need to release that inertia in order to get back in line, but the neutron at the end of the line is already oscillating to begin with. The core neutrons release that surplus inertia to get back to a balanced orientation, and the energy races right toward the neutron at the end of the line. This is like cracking the whip. The longer the line, the more and more the oscillation causes each subsequent neutron to jump above the line. Each successive neutron jumps higher than the previous one.
The neutron that is furthest out was oscillating because it was trying to release surplus inertia. The conventional explosion caused the innermost neutrons to oscillate, even though they possessed less energy than was needed to do so. As a result, the excessive motion of those innermost neutrons sweeping through the ether causes them to absorb energy from the ether. This extra energy increases the bounce of the oscillation, causing the next component to bounce higher and absorb even more energy from the ether than the previous neutron did.
Ever increasing amounts of inertia is drawn from the ether by each successive neutron in the path of the “whip”. By the time this ripple reaches the last neutron, it contains thousands of times more inertial energy than the initial conventional explosion had. The last neutron leaps WAY above the line, absorbing even more energy than all the previous neutrons did. To get back to the line and equalize its energy potential with the ether, it tries to pass this energy on to the next atomic component. Since it is the last component in the system of Plutonium atoms, it has nowhere else to send this energy to. So it releases all of that inertia with a sudden jolt back into the ether. All of the energy stolen from the ether is immediately forced to return there. BADDA BIG BOOM.
The “whip” effect also happened to the electrons and protons. Not only did it happen to them, but since they can extend even further out than the neutrons, they jumped higher above the line than the neutrons did. They absorb extra energy also, and it needs to be released into the ether as well.
This sudden inertia release which causes the explosion manifests with many different effects, thanks to the unified force. All frequency types get released from all the atomic components at huge amplitudes. This results in a huge radioactive pulse (from the electrons), blinding light (from the protons), a massive electromagnetic pulse (EMP) caused by the oscillation of the atoms, intense heat (from the outer neutrons), loud noise and massive vibrations (from the inner neutrons). And of course, a burst of linear inertia of huge amplitude which travels in every direction straight away from the center. Every non-Plutonium atom nearby experiences a massive infusion of inertia, and the effect propagates. Eventually, the propagation dissipates into the ether because of blending.
Once all of this inertia is released, the whole system is so energized with inertia that it no longer needs to sustain the connections between the Plutonium atoms. Each Plutonium atom is moving so fast, they separate from all the other Plutonium atoms. The Plutonium vaporizes (separates into individual disconnected Plutonium atoms) . The Plutonium breaks apart into little atomic pieces which are carried away in all directions by the force of the blast. When they come to rest, each Plutonium atom finds itself all alone. The wobble in the last neutron is now worse than ever. It emits lots of heat and high frequency energy that we call radiation. Everywhere the Plutonium pieces fell becomes radioactive.
Notice that nowhere was any atomic component “split” or shattered. Although atoms separated from one another, no actual individual atoms were damaged in the process. How’s that for a disclaimer? “No Plutonium atoms were harmed in the making of this explosion!” No atomic forces were released from within a shattered neutron. A neutron can’t be shattered. They are made of photons which are indestructible. The blast was just the result of the tremendous vibrating inertia contained in every part of the atom being released in every direction. The source of all this energy? The spinning of the universe imparted to each and every atom via the ether.
Imagine flying in a rocket ship that had the ability to take inertia from other places and add it to its own. It could then travel faster than the speed of light. The only problem is, the entire time it was flying at that speed, the universal ether current would be trying to drag it back down to the speed limit. If that rocket's engines happened to accidentally shut down, the universe would slam it right back down to the speed limit. Every atom of that ship would release this extra inertia in an instantaneous massive explosion.
Chapter 14 - THROW OUT THE TRASH
COPYRIGHT © 2021, By Jonathan P. Volkel
The transferring of energy from one piece of matter to the next by direct matter to matter physical contact can explain all the scientific data that exists for the movement of energy. The presence of the ether provides the scientifically law abiding explanations for the mechanical motion of “electromagnetic” waves through outer space. It explains the patterns of motion that move by propagation which have been given names such as “light” and “gravity”. The presence of the ether completely invalidates and erases the need for ALL of the theoretical mass-less waves, particles and forces. Combining the existence of the ether with a strict adherence to the Laws of Motion not only explains everything that has already been observed and measured, but it can also explain everything else that we may not yet understand. It must, because it is the reality of the universe we live in. THE ETHER ABSOLUTELY DOES EXIST.
If another theory denies the existence of the ether, then something is wrong with that theory, because propagation of motion through a medium (a.k.a. mechanical waves) is a fact and not a theory. The concept is based upon proven scientific laws, experimental evidence and simple everyday observations. It is an undeniable observable fact that propagation through objects made of matter is the only way that energy moves back and forth in the world that we can see all around us and can easily verify. It is also how energy MUST move through the depths of outer space and in the microscopic world of the atoms and their components. In fact, things function as they do in the large scale macro world that we can easily see only because it is happening the exact same way in the microscopic atomic world that we cannot see.
In Chapter 2 it was shown how one of the more impossible theories, time dilation, was false. Some can argue all they want and say that certain data “proves” that time dilation is real. What that simply means is that they are misinterpreting the data. Keep this in mind. It is EASY to use the known laws of science to conclusively PROVE that time dilation cannot and does not exist. In fact, an even closer examination of the theory is made in the Analysis topic “Time Dilation 2”. That examination demonstrates even further how completely invalid the theory of time dilation is.
Because time dilation is completely invalid, that by itself causes all of Einstein's theories to fall apart. Since Einstein's theories are thereby proven wrong, and if one is convinced that this explanation is also wrong, then, what is the right explanation? Don't disbelieve this simply because the Theory of Relativity has been so widely accepted. Forget the theories that are impossible to prove. Stick to the verifiable laws. Belief in the theories is causing science to continuously misinterpret the data in order to force that data to fit into the theory. There are many more examples of how the theories are contaminating the interpretation of scientific experiments and causing the data to be misunderstood, and a few examples of that are addressed here.
Time dilation is not only incorrect, but it is also a completely irrational theory. Belief in it cripples ones perception of all of reality. Thinking that the progress and flow of time is something that can be altered is not scientific at all. It is a conclusion that is not founded upon known and proven scientific principles. Acceptance of time dilation creates the mindset that other scientific laws and realities can also be ignored as well.
With only a little bit of thought and common sense, it is easy to see how impossible the concept of manipulating Time is. Consider any length of time. Divide that in half. Keep doing that over and over. How many times can you do that until you have a segment of time so small that it can’t be divided in half any further? There is no limit. No matter how small a segment of time you can conceive of, it can always be divided in half. As such, there is no infinitesimally small segment of time that you could point to and say “That is the smallest possible time increment in the universe”.
Time is a unified and homogeneous component of the universe that steadily and constantly indicates the continuation of existence. It is the perpetual recurrence of “now”. There is no way to speed it up or slow it down. “Existing”, “being” or “now” cannot be sped up, slowed down, or altered in any way. It can’t be stretched or stopped. Just like intangible space, time is not an “object” that can be manipulated. The only two constant, infinite, untouchable and unchangeable things in the universe, Time and Space, became the centerpiece of a theory. The “Space-time” theory teaches that both can be combined and altered. And, as if brainwashed, the scientific world accepted it.
Scientists accept time dilation without having any explanation whatsoever as to what time or motion are “made of”, and how those two “objects” are able to interact with one another. Equipped with this “permission slip” to avoid explanations, they repeated the same type of error with gravity. To think that space can be bent by gravity is as ridiculous and outrageous an idea as the idea that time can be altered by simply altering your rate of motion. And so, without having any credible explanation whatsoever as to what gravity and space are “made of” or the mechanism by which they can interact with one another, scientists use their time dilation mentality to boldly make the impossible claim that gravity somehow has the ability to bend space.
The confident and persistent violation of scientific laws during the past century has caused science to mutate in such a way as to result in the accidental creation of two different categories of science. The first is the category of the scientific laws. These are all the causes and effects that are provable, measurable, clearly defined and easily understood. They work the same way each and every time and the laws that define them are experimentally proven and flawlessly consistent. They never fail and are easily verified.
The second category is that of the scientific theories. These are assumptions made about things we don't understand. When the theory doesn't quite explain the observed effects, formulas are invented to try and force the theory to be true. When that proves too difficult or impossible, new theories are created to explain why the first theory doesn't quite work. Somehow, science has gotten the idea that it is acceptable to build an entire belief system comprised solely of unproven theories which are built upon even more unproven theories. Doing so is not acceptable. Such a practice falls more into the category of a cult religion’s mentality instead of a scientific search for truth built upon a foundation of verifiable facts. As a result, the combination of Einstein’s and Bohr’s impossible theories have left all of humanity the impossible task of trying to make sense of what is known today as the “Philosophy of Physics”.
The Theory of Relativity and all the interconnected unprovable theories related to it are all linked together by one initial assumption. That assumption is that energy can disconnect from matter and travel through space as a ghost-like mass-less wave or particle. It can travel through space without needing any sort of medium to propagate through. It self-propagates. Then, upon coming into contact with matter, it is able to cause changes in the matter’s existing state of motion. As such, these mass-less waves and particles are declared to be mass-less forces.
As seen herein, it should be obvious that such a belief about energy is completely incorrect and violates all the known and observable behaviors of energy in motion. Newton’s second law of motion defines a force: F = ma. A force is a mass in motion. That is, there is no such thing as a mass-less force. As such, all the Relativity theories and quantum theories are completely wrong. Nevertheless, science believes Relativity and quantum theory to be true, and has come to conclusions about data accumulated by scientific experiments according to those beliefs.
It is the belief in mass-less particles and forces that empowers the existence of something known as “The Standard Table of Elemental Particles”. It describes the belief in all the theoretical sub-atomic components which, when assembled, form the atom. The Standard Table of Elemental Particles includes the description of four different types of mass-less particles, known as “bosons”. The reason these particles were invented was because science believed that the forces which hold an atom together and keep it from flying apart originate from within the atom itself. They needed to come up with some sort of explanation as to what those forces could be and how they could function. The behavior of these imagined particles essentially describes how the proven scientific laws can be violated and ignored.
Science fails to realize, and does not believe, that the ether exists. If they saw this simple truth, then they would realize that the force which holds the atom together does NOT originate from within the atom. That force actually comes from outside the atom. The ether affects atoms submerged in it in a way similar to how water affects air submerged in it. Air bubbles are not held together by internal forces, and neither are atoms. As such, the Standard Table of Elemental Particles is completely wrong and totally backwards because its creation was based upon a completely wrong initial assumption.
Despite the seeming confidence of scientists about mass-less forces, mass-less particles, and the Standard Table of Elemental Particles, they obviously still possess a great deal of uncertainty about it. A video was made of the great “discovery” of one of those particles; the Higgs boson (the god particle). The scientists at a particle collider recorded a collision of sub-atomic particles and watched the “sparks” fly. They studied the image of all the different sparks that were created by that collision and somehow decided that one of them was the Higgs boson. At a big conference, they showed the picture of the sparks to a room full of scientists and said “We think we found the Higgs boson. This one is it. What do you all think?” They all looked at one another, shrugged, and then applauded.
Scientists at the particle colliders subject atoms to high powered electricity. They believe that this causes a positively charged proton to separate from an atom. They then create a pulsating magnetic current which they believe pushes the proton faster and faster, to near light speeds, around a circular path. Then they think they cause it to collide with another proton moving in the opposite direction. They believe the high speed collision results in the protons being smashed into mass-less energy particles. They think it is those mass-less energy particles that show up as “sparks” of various colored light on the monitors. Those multi colored sparks of light flash across the screen like a shooting star. After the briefest of moments, they vanish, never to be seen again.
In reality, they are not separating protons from atoms. The magnetic pulses are merely creating a high speed ether wind. The photons in the pathway of the magnetic pulses have their normal and random light speed back-and-forth vibrations (very high frequency) transformed into high speed directional motion (very low frequency) by the magnetic pulses. When two high speed ether currents travelling in opposite directions collide, they lose their low frequency directional motion and return to random high frequency back-and-forth vibration motion. As their frequency of vibrating motion increases back to their original pattern of motion, their vibration frequency passes through the range of visible light.
For a brief moment, they appear as sparks on the monitors. The photons caught in those artificially created magnetic ether currents momentarily take on the same frequencies that exist all the time in the Aurora Borealis. As a result, and at great expense, scientists are creating brief flashes of light in the particle collider identical to what one can continuously see for free near the Polar Regions. The bad theories are causing the scientists to completely misunderstand what is really going on. This results in their imaginations running wild as they try and interpret the observed flashes of light and then create explanations which force those observations to conform to their theories.
The worst part about the particle accelerator is the part that is really scary. Based upon their theories of what the accelerator would do, they initially believed that there was a real risk that they might accidentally create a Black Hole and damage, if not destroy, the Earth. They evaluated the risk and decided; "What the heck. Let's run the accelerator anyway." Of course, there was no Black Hole because their theories are completely wrong and there is no such thing as a Black Hole, but that's not the point. The point is; they didn't know that! Sooner or later, their lack of understanding on how the universe works might actually create a real problem, and they will blindly walk right into it. In fact, they are doing that very type of thing right now. Exactly how and why will be explained near the end of this chapter.
Consider the concept of “a particle of energy with no mass”. In your imagination, “zoom in” on the ether for a closer “look”. Look at two adjacent objects made of matter (photons). With your mind’s eye, zoom in even closer. Look at the empty space between them. What do you “see”? Nothing is there. Even light does not exist there. Light is a specific pattern of matter in motion. It only exists because many photons collide with one another and transfer the energy contained within them from one to the other.
Scientists believe that there exists a mass-less particle of energy that can somehow occupy the void of empty space, separate and apart from matter. What is it made of? What holds it together? What kind of energy is it? Science has no provable answers to these questions. Their belief is not a concept based on actual science. It is not even based on a foundation of understanding what “energy” actually is. In simplest terms, they believe in ghosts.
And what of that empty space between photons? What is the so called “fabric of space” made of? Obviously, it isn’t made of anything. It is just empty space. And yet, it is believed that this void can be bent or stretched somehow. By what force is this possible? They believe that gravity does this. In fact, that belief led to the belief that space itself can also cease to exist. Science even believes that mass-less energy even has the ability to cause space to come into existence.
Just as it is with Time, Space is not an object that can be altered. The energy that causes gravity is no different than that of light. It does not exist in the empty spaces between particles. Gravity is a steady stream of photons emitted from atomic components that moves in a straight line (matter in motion). It only travels through space because one photon moves and bumps into another one. Upon colliding, the pattern of photon motion that we call gravity transfers from one particle to the next through space. When those photons collide with atoms, the atoms move too. The basics of how it works are described in Chapter 12 “The Smallest Picture”.
Gravity is given the credit for creating Black Holes. Black holes are an inevitable extension of the theoretical gravitational concepts proposed by Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity. The belief in Black Holes stems from the theories on what gravity is and how it interacts with space.
Black Holes are as equally impossible as mass-less particles. The main component actually responsible for gravity is the ether. It surrounds and squeezes all the atoms. It is the source of the center seeking effect that fuels gravity. And, just as an air bubble’s size is determined by the surrounding water pressure, so too, the distance between atoms is determined by the surrounding ether pressure. In addition to that limitation, no two distinct pieces of matter can occupy the same space at the same time. And so, if photons are inserted into an atom by the pattern of gravity motion, then an equal number of photons must also come out of that atom. The concept of a Black Hole totally defies the laws of nature.
Because scientists do not know what the Unified Force is, they do not understand that the only difference between one type of energy and another is its pattern of motion. Excessive gravitational energy input into a mass does not result in a Black Hole, where everything is sucked into a “singularity” from which nothing can ever escape. Instead, gravity input must result in an equivalent quantity of energy output. However, that energy emerges with a pattern of photon motion that is different than that of gravity’s pattern of photon motion. Atoms transform the pattern of photon gravity motion into different energy patterns of photon motion, such as heat and light.
Without a proper understanding of gravity or a belief in the ether, scientists had to stretch their imaginations and develop more wild theories in an attempt to try and explain why a star is so hot and bright. They decided that it must be caused by nuclear fusion. They theorized that a star must be made of Hydrogen. It is the fusion of Hydrogen into Helium which gives off the heat and light. And, when all of the fuel is eventually gone, the star collapses into a Black Hole.
That theory is completely wrong. In reality, the only major difference between a star and the average planet is the quantity of mass. The huge quantity of extra mass possessed by stars results in a proportionate amount of extra gravity. The extra gravity results in a proportionate increase in pressure within the core of the star. The extra pressure creates extra heat within the core. The extra heat is so extreme, that it can transform rock into a gas. However, the extremely high pressure in the star’s core forces the gaseous rock to condense into a super heated liquid.
The pressure from gravity input into the core of the star builds and builds, like a pressure cooker. When the pressure builds high enough, the “pressure cooker” blows. Huge quantities of super heated liquid erupt to the surface of the star. Once there, the molten rock instantly releases all the extra heat into the star’s atmosphere and into space. The release of all of that extra energy allows the liquid to stabilize as very hot molten rock. As a result, the entire surface of the star is liquid rock, which has temperatures in the tens of thousands of degrees, whereas the upper atmosphere of the star has temperatures in the tens of millions of degrees.
Our Sun is actually one giant ball of liquid elements with a super heated atmosphere. As new molten liquids erupt from the core and settle on the surface, the rest of the upper liquids sink down to fill the inner gaps created by the eruption. As such, the liquid substance of the Sun perpetually circulates from the core to the surface, then back down to the core again.
And so, the energy of motion goes into a star as gravity (linear straight line motion). The same amount of the energy of motion comes out again as heat and light (high frequency back and forth motion). What goes in must also come out. The fuel for stars is not Hydrogen. It is gravity. And the fuel for gravity is the ether. As long as the ether exists, a star will never “burn out”. A star does NOT function as some sort of fusion reactor. It’s functioning is more like that of an air conditioner. It uses pressure to move heat from one location (the star’s core) to another location (the star’s surface and outer space).
What about the theories of Dark Matter and Dark Energy? This is an interesting topic worthy of greater explanation. However, it is too involved to go into detail about it here. In general, science realizes that there are many effects going on out there in space that they can't explain. As a result of so many unexplained anomalies existing all around us, it was calculated that almost 85% of all matter in the universe is invisible and undetectable by us. They have named this invisible matter “Dark Matter”, and have ascribed its motion to be caused by “Dark Energy”. They consider the discovery and identification of Dark Matter and Dark Energy to be a very high priority.
The invisible matter that they detect is actually the countless tiny sub-atomic photons that fill the ether. Over a century ago, scientists believed in that matter and named it “The Lumineferous Aether”. Today, backwards theories have resulted in “light” becoming “dark”, spawning names like “Dark Matter” and “Dark Energy”. Without the knowledge of the ether, one can only imagine the types of theories that would eventually evolve in order to try and explain the ensuing effects of photon collisions and ether currents. Two of the greatest mysteries of modern science are solved by the understanding that the ether exists.
The most horrific theoretical guess of all is “The Big Bang Theory” (the theory, not the comedy show). We see this theory mentioned on television all the time. We watch scientists telling us confidently exactly how it all happened, as if it was a proven fact. They base its occurrence on a scenario where initially no time or space existed, and a super powerfully charged particle from who knows where came here and exploded. Its vast internal energy disbursed into space. These “energies” somehow coalesced into matter and here we are. And it all happened about 14 billion years ago.
No such thing as time existing? There has never been a more ridiculous statement than that. No space existing? Equally ridiculous! If space didn’t exist, then what remains: Non-existence? An explosion released energy that coalesced? Energy is able to coalesce… into matter!? What is that? What kind of energy? What is it made of? Can an example of that happening in the real world be demonstrated in any way? Did the people who invented this theory even know what an explosion is? Do they know what energy actually is?
The impossible workings of the Big Bang Theory are discussed in greater depth in the Analysis topic “The Energy of Motion”. Essentially, every imagined cause and effect that scientists use to try and make the Big Bang Theory seem plausible totally defies the laws of science and reality. For example, they believe that our universe is expanding outward from some central point due to the Big Bang explosion. And yet, they have to simultaneously ignore that motion and create magical forces and effects to explain how an outward explosion also resulted in the spinning of all of the galaxies and their contents. Belief in the Big Bang Theory is the equivalent of believing that magic is real.
THE GREENHOUSE GAS THEORY
Although there are so many incorrect theories that exist which are accepted as facts, there is only one more bad theory that will be discussed in this category of “Throw out the trash”. It is perhaps the biggest topic of the day and so it should be addressed. The bad theory is associated with the arrival of global warming.
The Earth’s temperature seems to be steadily increasing, year after year, in a pattern referred to as “global warming”. What the temperature is actually doing is not a theory. The reason WHY it is happening is the breeding ground for bad theories. Some scientists believe that global warming is caused by the effects described in the Greenhouse Gas Theory.
Essentially the theory boils down to this. Carbon emissions created by industrialization cause Carbon atoms to become part of the atmosphere. The ever increasing emissions cause an excessive quantity of Carbon to be incorporated into the atmosphere to a degree which hadn’t existed prior to the industrial revolution. As such, these extra Carbon atoms in the air are trapping more and more heat. They reflect the infrared heat that rises from the Earth and send it back down to the Earth. And slowly but surely, the temperature steadily increases. The more Carbon trapped in the atmosphere, the quicker the heat builds up. That about sums it up: Right? Well…not exactly.
Actually, there’s more to the Greenhouse Gas Theory than just Carbon emissions. In order to fight global warming, the world’s attention does seem to be focused solely on reducing Carbon emissions. However, scientists classify several different gases as being Greenhouse Gases. They believe the three gases that have the most influence on global temperatures are Carbon, methane and water vapor.
There’s not much anyone can do about the water vapor in our atmosphere (nor should we try). But, where is all the methane coming from? Methane is composed of one Carbon atom combined with four Hydrogen atoms. Methane is the main ingredient of natural gas. The majority of methane is created by single celled organisms which break down organic matter. They can also cause larger animals, such as cows and chickens, to produce methane. Since the population of the world has increased, then the need for food has increased. Increased quantities of livestock result in increased methane production.
Scientists believe that all of the different greenhouse gases contribute in sending the heat that rises from the Earth back down again. In other words, scientists want us to believe that heat does not just rise anymore. Instead, they want us to believe that heat also travels down.
After reading this paper and understanding how the system really works, it should become apparent that heat doesn’t bounce off of anything. All energy, including heat, gets absorbed by atoms and is then transferred to other nearby atoms. Also, it is EVERY type of atom that does this. In which direction does the energy get transferred? All atoms will send their excess energy in EVERY direction.
An example that will help to visualize how and why atoms always send their energy in every direction is to compare it to the behavior of a pool of water. An object dropped into that pool of water will create waves that move away from the object in every direction. It is impossible to drop an object into the water and have waves move away in only one direction.
Any energy, including heat energy, is simply mass in motion. Newton’s second law of motion defines a mass in motion as being a force (F = ma). Newton’s first law of motion reveals that when a force makes contact with any object, that object will experience a change in its existing state of motion.
When a Carbon atom (an object) is struck by an infrared wave (a force), it changes (increases) its state of motion. All Carbon atoms in our atmosphere are completely surrounded by a “pool” of other atoms. Just like ripples in a pool of water, the Carbon atom will transfer its heightened motion (caused by the application of heat) in all directions to all the atoms that surround it.
If that energy is sent to an area that restricts motion (it’s too crowded with other atoms), then the energy will be sent right back to that same atom again. As a result, energy will end up moving towards an area that has less opposition to motion. The atoms possessing the heightened motion move towards the area that provides more room to move around in.
The energized atoms will try to push other atoms that are blocking its motion out of the way. If the slower atoms are too numerous and cannot move out of the way, the more energized atom will get pushed back by them to an area where there is more room. Atoms possessing less energy (less motion) do not and cannot move to an area possessing more energy (more motion). When it comes to heat, the location of the most unrestricted movement is in outer space. If not for gravity’s hold, heated air would keep on rising until it reached the wide open area of atom free outer space. That is why all heat rises.
Another example that aids in understanding how heated particles behave in the atmosphere and why heat always rises is to compare it to another process that is easily demonstrated. This example also uses a body of water to aid in understanding. Just like the air, a body of water is also a medium of propagation that moves. It serves as a good example because we can easily see what happens in water with the naked eye. In this case, the way that heated particles behave in the atmosphere is the same way that air behaves when it is submerged under water.
There is more to understanding the movement of heat than just the analysis of a single object’s motion. Other forces and the motion of other nearby objects must also be taken into consideration. Gravity is a second force that plays a big part in affecting the movement of objects. Gravity causes atoms to move towards one another. The stronger the gravity is, the more crowded the atoms will be. The effect of gravity on water aids in understanding the effect of gravity on the atmosphere and the motion of heat in the atmosphere.
Thanks to gravity, water pressure continually increases the deeper down into the water you go. Air is much less dense than water, and so possesses less pressure than water. Any air submerged under water is completely surrounded by the water and gets squeezed by the greater water pressure from all directions, forming the air into a bubble. However, since gravity causes the water pressure at the bottom of a submerged air pocket to be greater than the water pressure at the top of the air pocket, the submerged air will get squeezed more at the bottom. This causes the submerged air to continually rise. Underwater air bubbles ALWAYS rise! We have seen this happen countless times with our own eyes and we know that it ALWAYS works this way.
Thanks to gravity, atmospheric air pressure also continually increases the closer and closer you get to the ground. Heated air particles attain increased energy, and therefore increased movement, requiring more space for them to move around in. This results in there being less air particles per cubic inch of space. This means that the air pressure of the heated air is decreased. This causes the greater surrounding air pressure to squeeze it. Since gravity causes the surrounding air pressure to always be greater at the bottom, the warm air will get squeezed upward. It will continue to rise until it reaches a level where all the surrounding pressure is equal to its own pressure. After shedding its heat into space, its energy decreases and therefore its motion decreases. It contracts, taking up less space. Now having more particles per cubic inch, its pressure rises, causing it to sink back down to an atmospheric level equal to its own pressure.
To think that rising heat could turn around and travel back down again is similar to thinking that air bubbles rising in a fish tank could reverse direction and head back down again. Even if you put a lid on top of the tank, it is incorrect to think that, once enough bubbles accumulate at the top, or if you change the type of air being inserted, or if you change the composition of the lid, newly arriving bubbles will then start to turn around and head down again. Instead, pressure will build at the top until the lid blows off.
Heat is transferred by direct atom to atom physical contact. If some heated atmospheric atoms transfer their heat to atoms below them, then those lower atoms will experience increased motion. Their effective pressure will drop, and they will immediately be pushed upward by the greater pressure of the lower atmosphere, carrying the heat with them. In other words, heat can’t travel down too far or for very long. Gravity will not allow it.
Even if one completely ignores the effects that air pressure has on heated particles and still insists on believing that greenhouse gas atoms are somehow able to reflect heat back down to Earth, then realize that such a belief creates another contradiction. Whatever the greenhouse gases are doing with the energy that rises up from the Earth, they must also be doing the same thing with the energy that comes down from the Sun. In other words, those very same greenhouse gases that are supposedly reflecting energy back down to Earth must also be reflecting the Sun’s energy back out into space. It balances out, resulting in zero energy imbalance. Why would it and how could it be otherwise? How could atoms possibly work in one direction only? They can’t.
Also, if greenhouse gases in the upper atmosphere were actually able to reflect heat and send the heat back down, then that heat would have to pass through the rest of the non-greenhouse gas atmosphere in order to reach the ground. The subsequently re-heated non-greenhouse gas air that exists between the ground and the greenhouse gases in the upper atmosphere would quickly rise, carrying the downward moving heat right back up again, long before it ever had a chance to reach the ground. The entire Greenhouse Gas Theory is so self contradictory and illogical that it doesn’t even conform to scientific laws and plain old common sense.
In fact, the Greenhouse Gas Theory does not even conform to the way an actual greenhouse really works. Attaching the name “Greenhouse” to the theory implies that an actual greenhouse works because it reflects heat down. Actually, a greenhouse stays warm on the inside because it allows sunlight to come in while simultaneously preventing the heated inside air from exchanging places with the cooler outside air. If the sunlight is removed (night time), or if the greenhouse walls are removed and outside air is allowed to circulate to the inside, then the extra heat quickly disappears. Just open the windows of any regular heated house in winter to see how quickly the temperature inside the house drops. It works exactly the same with a greenhouse. A greenhouse uses sunlight to continually heat the interior air during the day. At night, a greenhouse does not reflect the existing heat back in again. It needs an extra heater to maintain warmth. Without that heater, the interior nighttime temperature of the greenhouse will drop to the same as the outside temperature.
Since all atoms transmit their excess motion in every direction, then the more particles that exist in the air, the more of the Sun’s energy will get sent back out into space. As a result, an increase in greenhouse gas particles (or any extra particles in our atmosphere) should ultimately result in lower surface temperatures. In fact, large volcanic eruptions, which spew huge amounts of greenhouse gases and other particles into the atmosphere, have always resulted in ensuing colder global temperatures. Why would anyone think that so-called man-made greenhouse gases are able to have the completely opposite effect and cause global temperatures to increase?
Some scientists try and argue that the frequency (wavelength) of sunlight and infrared heat are different. That is why sunlight can come in, but infrared heat can’t get out.
It is important to remember how the unified force works. There is only one energy, but there are many different patterns of energy motion. Solar radiation is one type of a high frequency pattern emitted by the Sun and is carried to us by the photons of the ether. That pattern exists in greater abundance near the Sun. As such, it moves away from the Sun and into outer space, saturating the photons of the ether with that pattern.
The Earth possesses a much lower concentration of that high frequency pattern, allowing that energy to be absorbed by the atoms that make up the Earth. The atoms then transform that pattern of high frequency photon motion into a lower frequency pattern of atomic motion which we identify as “heat”. That pattern exists in high abundance on Earth but in low abundance in space. And so, that pattern of heat motion will eventually be transferred from the atoms in the upper atmosphere back to the photons and will move more freely towards outer space. This results in an effect that causes us to say “heat always rises”.
One might wonder; “If heat always rises, then how is it possible that the Sun’s heat comes down to us while the Earth’s heat also rises at the same time? Isn’t heat simultaneously moving in both directions?”
It is not exactly correct to say that the Sun is sending us heat. Instead, it is sending us a higher frequency RADIATION. There is a big difference between “heat” and “radiation”. Radiation consists of many tiny sub-atomic pieces of matter (photons) which, when moving as a group, have a very high speed and high frequency pattern of back and forth motion. One example of a type of that radiation is something we call “visible light”.
Once that radiation strikes atoms, the collision by the tiny photons onto the much more massive atoms transforms the pattern of high frequency motion into the slower frequency pattern of atomic motion that we call “heat”. The transference of that slower pattern of motion from atom to atom is perceived by us as being the movement of “heat”. And so, the Sun’s energy does not come down to the Earth in the form of heat. It only becomes heat after the photons make contact with atoms.
The high frequency pattern of photon motion being generated by the Sun ALWAYS moves away from the Sun. When that energy strikes the atoms that make up the Earth, the Earth’s atoms transform that pattern into a slower pattern of atomic motion (heat). The atoms eventually transfer that new slower pattern of atomic motion back to the photons, transforming the heat into a different type of lower frequency radiation. That slower pattern of photon motion ALWAYS moves towards outer space. And so, even though energy moves in both directions at the same time, “heat” does not. Any heat source will send out its heat in ALL directions. However, any heat that is sent back down towards the Earth will quickly turn around and start to rise. Ultimately, the net result is that all heat will rise.
Remember that “energy” is simply mass in motion. Since no two objects can occupy the same space at the same time, then whatever energy (mass in motion) might move into the Earth, and equal quantity of mass in motion must simultaneously depart. The only difference between the in-going and outgoing energy is the pattern in which the mass moves. In the case of “light” and “heat”, the pattern of light energy is created by many small particles moving very fast. The pattern of heat energy is created by fewer larger particles moving more slowly. Mass and motion are inversely related, but the total energy input and output is the same.
If one were to search the internet for details on the Greenhouse Gas Theory, one would discover much scientific debate on the topic of global warming. There are scientists who firmly believe in the Greenhouse Gas Theory, and others who firmly believe that it is utter nonsense. They debate back and forth in on-line forums and chat room text discussions, trying to persuade one another. They use arguments about wavelengths, absorption rates, plant biology, and so forth. All of it boils down to very detailed discussions over scientific concepts and minutiae that are either irrelevant to what is really going on, or are complete misinterpretations of the data. The truth is much simpler and more obvious than their misdirected and irrelevant micro-analysis can reveal.
One scientist involved in such a debate fervently supported the Greenhouse Gas Theory. He referred to the conditions that exist on the Moon to support his position. He believed that since the Moon is our closest neighbor in space, then the effects of the Sun on it should be similar to the effects of the Sun on the Earth. However, something is causing temperatures on the Moon to be very different than temperatures on the Earth.
During the Lunar day, temperatures on the Moon can exceed 260 degrees Fahrenheit. However, during the Lunar night, the temperature on the Moon will drop quickly and drastically to -200 degrees Fahrenheit. The reason this extreme drop in temperature happens is because the Moon has no water vapor or any kind of an atmosphere at all. The Earth does have an atmosphere and its temperature does not drop so drastically at night. Therefore, he believes that this proves that the Earth’s atmosphere acts like a greenhouse gas that traps heat, keeping the Earth warm at night, thereby proving that the Greenhouse Gas Theory is true.
Is he telling the truth in his comparison of the Moon to the Earth? Well…sort of. Actually, he is telling a partial truth. It is indeed true that the Moon’s temperature does drop so very drastically during the Lunar night. However, he is leaving out a few major important facts in order to make it seem as if the Greenhouse Gas Theory is true. In fact, the rest of the truth that he is so obviously omitting conclusively proves that the Greenhouse Gas Theory is completely false. Can you see the holes in his argument for yourself?
This chapter is all about false theories and twisted data. The Moon argument is another perfect example of the scientific deception that humanity is being subjected to. In order to be better equipped to see through science’s errors, analyze the Moon argument to try and detect the faulty reasoning. After giving the topic some thought, continue reading to see the errors revealed.
Although the pro-Greenhouse Gas Theory scientist did mention that during the Lunar day, the Moon’s temperature will climb to nearly +260 degrees Fahrenheit, he completely ignored the significance of that fact. The Lunar day temperature climbs that high also because the Moon has no atmosphere. So then, why doesn’t the Earth’s daytime temperature also climb to +260 degrees? It is because the Earth does have an atmosphere.
The atoms in the air collect the Sun’s energy and send it in EVERY direction. As a result, half of the Sun’s energy goes back into space, and half comes down to the surface. That is why the hottest temperatures recorded here only reach approximately +130 degrees Fahrenheit (half the Moon’s hottest temperature). This fact conclusively proves that the arguments about different wavelengths are irrelevant. The effect of the atmosphere on incoming and outgoing energy works equally in both directions no matter the wavelength!
At night, the heat rising from the Earth again gets sent in all directions by the atmosphere. Half of it goes out into space, and half of it gets send back down towards the Earth again. If “down” is warmer, then it immediately rises right back up again, long before it has a chance to reach the ground. It’s sort of like “taking two steps forward and one step back”. Although the back and forth movement of heat slows down its escape, the heat does ultimately end up moving into outer space. The back and forth movement of the heat in our atmosphere is why the Earth’s surface temperature cools more slowly at night than the Moon’s does. Even so, when comparing the Earth’s nighttime surface temperatures to the Moon’s nighttime surface temperatures, it seems as if the Earth should still cool faster than it actually does. So then, why doesn’t it?
Another blatantly obvious omission by the Greenhouse Gas Theory believer, and an important factor that affects the Earth’s cooling rate, is the rate at which the Earth spins. It spins much faster than the Moon. The Earth makes one complete rotation in twenty four hours. The Moon makes one complete rotation in twenty eight days. Before the Earth has a chance to cool too much, the sunlight returns and re-warms it again.
There is also one other MAJOR difference between the Earth and the Moon which the Greenhouse Gas Theory supporter managed to “conveniently” neglect. The Moon has zero water, whereas two thirds of the Earth is covered in water. The pro Greenhouse Gas Theory scientist acknowledged that the Moon had no water, but only in the context of it being absent as atmospheric water vapor. He completely ignored the role that the huge bodies of water on the surface of the Earth play in atmospheric temperatures.
Anyone who lives near a coastal area knows firsthand the effects that large bodies of water have on the air temperature. Hot summer days can have coastal temperatures that are noticeably cooler than inland temperatures. Cold winter days can have coastal temperatures that are noticeably warmer than inland temperatures. In other words, the temperature of a large body of water definitely has a major effect on air temperature. Additionally, anyone who lives near a large body of water knows that it could be freezing cold outside, causing all the moisture in the air to freeze and become snow, and yet the nearby lake or ocean remains unfrozen. Large bodies of water require much more time to transfer heat than water vapor in the air does.
An interesting thing about the Earth’s oceans is that the Sun is not the only source of heat for them. There is a great deal of underwater volcanic activity that is constantly occurring every day under the oceans. The volcanic activity heats the water, which then rises. Cold water moves in to take the place of the rising hot water. The heated water eventually reaches the surface of the ocean and then transfers the heat into the air. From there the heat continues to rise and ends up in outer space.
There are all kinds of data available on annual volcanic activity. Some of that data indicates an increase of volcanic activity by as much as five percent in the last 20 years. However, that does not necessarily mean that volcanic activity is actually increasing. It might just mean that our ability to observe and document it is continually improving. It is important to remember not to jump to any conclusions based upon that data alone. Even so, since two thirds of the surface of the Earth is covered in water, and since a large percentage of the ocean floor remains unexplored, then obviously there is a great deal of lava flowing into the bottom of the oceans that scientists are still completely unaware of. There might really be an actual increase in volcanic activity and science is completely unable to detect it and does not even realize it.
Could it even be possible that the annual quantity of volcanic eruptions is the same, but the average temperature of the lava has increased by a few degrees? If it had, would scientists even notice? There is no accurate data going back far enough in time regarding exact lava temperatures in order for science to come to any sort of a correct conclusion about increases in the annual total volcanic energy output. One thing is absolutely certain. An increase in the total annual volcanic heat output would most definitely increase the temperature of the oceans and account for global warming.
The Greenhouse Gas Theory relies heavily upon Einstein’s perceptions of energy. Einstein’s theory was completely wrong. As a result, so are the impossible claims made by the Greenhouse Gas Theory. And yet, extra warming of the oceans by increased volcanic activity is a simple and easy explanation for global warming that does not require false scientific beliefs and deceptive twisting of the facts in order to make it work.
But, is it possible for volcanic heat output to increase? How can it? Why would it? In order to better understand how it could be possible, one must remember that the ether exists and what the unified force is.
The Earth is submerged in the ether. Any increase of energy in the ether transfers into the atoms that make up the Earth. Atoms can ultimately transform whatever pattern of increased sub-atomic motion that the ether may have into different patterns of increased atomic motion. And so, increased sub-atomic “electromagnetic” waves get transformed into increased atomic heat.
Heightened energy in the ether means that the sub-atomic photons are moving faster. This means that more photons collide with the Earth’s atoms per second. This ultimately means that the spray of photons (which causes gravity to work) that emits from the spinning atoms contains more photons than usual (for a full description of how the atoms create gravity, see the Analysis topic “Sub-Atomic Motion”). As a result, the acceleration of gravity increases. When gravity increases, pressure in the core of the Earth increases. When the pressure increases, heat increases. The increased heat results in increased volcanic energy. Increased volcanic energy results in global warming.
The acceleration of gravity on Earth measures at 9.8 m/s/s (32.17405 ft/s/s). Were these values exactly the same 100 years ago? Is there any way to know? For example, if the acceleration of gravity increased by one tenth of one percent to a rate of 9.81 m/s/s, would we even notice? Lava temperatures could increase because of this which would increase the heat being transferred into the bottom of the oceans. Increasing the ocean temperatures by a few degrees would also increase atmospheric temperatures and would be classified as global warming.
Gravity readings on the surface of this planet are inexact and vary according to altitude, latitude and longitude, making it impossible to attain an exact measurement. None of that really matters. All that actually matters is the final cumulative force of gravity measured at the center of the Earth. There is just no way to ever know for certain what that value actually is or if it has changed at all during the last century.
It is not necessary for anyone to even bother to take the time to learn the scientific and technical explanations for heat’s behavior in order to understand global warming. It is not necessary to blindly trust the theories of others. Everyone should already know for a fact from their own daily personal life experience that heat ALWAYS rises! It is why the attic is the hottest area in a house and the basement is the coolest area. It is why candle flames, match flames and campfires always point up. It is why barbecuing with Carbon rich charcoal works. It is why we put our pots and pans on top of the flames in order to cook. It is why steam rises out of a pot of boiling water. It is also why chimneys work. The concentrated Carbon emissions that saturate a chimney do not send the heat back down. The rising heat that comes from the burning of Carbon rich coal or wood carries the smoke up the chimney and out of the house. Factories usually burn coal, oil or natural gas in order to create heat and thereby create Carbon emissions. Carbon emissions end up in the upper atmosphere solely because they absorbed heat and got hot. And heat always rises.
The Greenhouse Gas theory contradicts common sense and life experience. If the Carbon contained in emissions actually reflected heat back down, then those emissions would never have been able to rise up into the atmosphere in the first place. In other words, the presence of the Carbon in the atmosphere is an additional proof that the Carbon is not reflecting heat down, but is instead absorbing the heat which causes it to rise, just like the rest of the warm air around it.
As the Carbon rises, it sheds the heat into the cooler surrounding environment. As it cools, the Carbon bonds with other atoms in order to regain the lost energy and stabilize. Some of the Carbon bonds with other Carbon and falls to the ground as soot. Other Carbon atoms bond with Oxygen to cause the creation of Carbon Monoxide and Carbon Dioxide. The Carbon Dioxide eventually cools and descends to a level where the plants can reach it. Plants absorb the Carbon Dioxide and incorporate the Carbon into themselves while releasing the Oxygen back into the atmosphere. And so, the perpetual arrival and subsequent departure of Carbon into and out of our atmosphere conclusively proves that the Carbon absorbs heat (causing it to rise) and then transmits that heat upward (causing it to come down again) and does not reflect heat. The entire process results in the Carbon eventually arriving right back on the ground again.
The Greenhouse gas theory is as self-contradictory as are many of science’s modern day Relativity based theories. Even to this very day, scientists still must call it a THEORY (even though some might refuse to). That is because they absolutely cannot prove that it actually works that way at all. And, they never will. That is because the theory is totally wrong. In fact, if one performed an experiment which proved that Carbon emissions did not reflect heat (like burning Carbon based fuels and watching the emissions rise), science would refuse to acknowledge their error and would still cling to the Greenhouse Gas Theory. They would say “No, the theory hasn’t been proven to be wrong. We just haven’t been able to prove that it is right yet.” They will continue to use the deceptive twisting and partial use of factual data in order to try and force the data to fit the theory.
When attempting to understand the Earth’s total temperature, one must remember and take into account that the ether does exist. Think of the ether as being a vast ocean of particles in which the Earth is immersed. It is the dominant factor in determining the Earth’s average temperature.
Imagine an insulated container, like a thermos. Fill that container with a hot liquid, seal it tight, and submerge it in a large body of cold water. Now imagine filling a thermos with a very cold liquid, sealing it, and placing it in a large body of hot water. In both cases, the end result will be the same. The thermos insulation only slows the process, but cannot stop the inevitable outcome. The temperature of the liquid inside the thermos will change and become equal with the temperature of the large body of water. The equalization of temperatures will happen even faster if the thermos is full of holes.
So it is with the Earth immersed within the ether. Even if one believes that greenhouse gases act as an insulator, the Earth will behave just as the liquid in the thermos behaves. If the ether has less energy than the Earth has, then any temperature build up on the Earth will be quickly drained into the ether. Scattered greenhouse gases cannot insulate against that. Given even the slightest atmospheric openings in theoretical greenhouse gases (holes in the insulator), an energy buildup on the Earth will rush through the openings towards the ether in order to equalize with it.
Global warming on the Earth actually indicates an excess energy buildup in the ether that surrounds the Earth. This causes energy (heat) to increase here (global warming), forcing the Earth to maintain an energy balance with the surrounding ether. Such an energy buildup in the ether can be caused by only one thing in this solar system; THE SUN.
Claims of man made global warming are based upon science’s estimations of what the Earth’s temperature should be right now. They have analyzed the Earth’s orbital patterns and its resultant distance from and orientation to the Sun. The data that they possess represents less than 1 percent of Earth’s total orbital motion (it would take over 100,000 years for Earth’s orbital variations to go full circle and begin to repeat the pattern). Using this sparse and incomplete data as a guide, they calculate that the Earth should be in a cooling period now. They acknowledge that global warming does repeatedly return in cycles, but they believe that it is too soon for this particular cycle to be occurring now. Trusting totally in their assumptions and predictions about Earth’s movements, and lacking any other insight as to why the Earth is warming, they jump to the irrational conclusion that the cause for the supposedly premature heat is a man made one.
Scientists fail to look at the bigger picture for the source of the warming. They fail to analyze changes in the Sun’s motion as being a potential cause. All of the planets in our solar system have an effect not only on the motion of the Earth, but also upon the motion of the Sun. Approximately once every 500 years, the majority of the planets are in alignment. That is, they are positioned on the same side of the Sun. When this happens, their combined mass shifts the center of gravity within the Sun to being slightly off-center. This causes the Sun to wobble around that off-center point.
500 years later, the planets align again, but this time they do it on a different side of the Sun. This causes the Sun to wobble more in that direction. In effect, the planets cause the Sun to rock back and forth. This rocking of the Sun causes it to release a little more energy than usual and the effects can last for quite a while. In fact, the waxing and waning of the Sun’s energy release due to the back and forth wobble takes about 1,000 years. This surge of energy saturates the ether in our vicinity for centuries and results in the Earth acquiring more solar energy than usual. The unified force allows for that energy to manifest as extra heat here on Earth. Apparently, scientists have not taken the Sun’s motion into account at all when determining what our planetary temperature should be.
The following charts represent planetary temperatures over a period of time. The first chart depicts temperatures over the past 425,000 years. The first chart is, of course, absurd. There is no way we could know what the Earth’s temperatures actually were beyond recorded human history. What that chart does reveal is that the people who created it acknowledge that there is a cyclic pattern to the Earth’s temperatures. The other two charts depict temperature changes over a more reasonable time span. The one thing they all have in common is that they all agree that there is definitely a pattern of repeating global warming temperature cycles.
Right now, we are experiencing a temperature bounce in the upward direction. The recent cold side of the bounce was named “The Little Ice Age”. One thousand years ago, Greenland was actually a green land. Look at Greenland now. The Little Ice Age has caused it to completely freeze over. There was no industrialization one thousand years ago, but the temperature then was much warmer than it is now and the patterns still wobbled. Any attempt to try and stop the temperature wobble is futile. One would be fighting against the motion of the Sun and the forces of the universe.
The charts all indicate that we are currently experiencing a warming period. They also clearly show that we, at present, are nowhere near being as warm as it was 1,000 years ago. Accurate temperature information is unavailable beyond 200 years into the past. After that, we must rely on historical accounts. Scientists attempt to gather even more information by “proxy” in order to try and determine ancient climates. For example, they gather evidence from tree fossils and ice cores. These techniques are not as reliable as historic accounts. Do the proxy results indicate a localized climate event or a global condition? Is the dating accurate or is it based on faulty assumptions? Whatever the actual truth may be, one thing is certain. There is a cyclic up-and-down oscillation of temperatures. We were in a downtrend, and now it seems to be turning around. Remember that the same people who assured us about the validity of time dilation, the Big Bang Theory and Radioactive Decay dating are the ones who are also telling us about the climate.
Some scientists will even claim that the proxy data indicates that we are warmer now than it was one thousand years ago. Such claims ultimately prove that the proxy data is definitely flawed. Greenland was NOT covered in ice one thousand years ago. It is still completely covered in ice today. Obviously, it must have been warmer one thousand years ago than it is today. Scientists have grown so accustomed to supporting the most ridiculous and impossible theories, that they now boldly make the most blatantly false claims without fear of contradiction. Did it ever occur to them that perhaps their theories on interpreting proxy data are flawed? Apparently not! They consistently misinterpret the data in order to force it to fit into their theories.
Notice too that the temperature cycles depicted on the above charts are not smooth flowing curves. There are up and down jolts within each up and down cycle. It looks more like the stock market results than a weather forecast. We are currently in an uptrend. Could that uptrend actually be just a momentary upward jolt in a continuing downtrend? Is it an upwards jolt in a new long-term uptrend? Only centuries of time will tell. And yet, Global Warming enthusiasts are confidently telling us that we are headed for a global disaster 50 years from now, and it’s our own fault.
This is NOT to say that reducing Carbon emissions is a bad idea. It is a known fact that too much Carbon in our atmosphere is bad for our health. We know how unpleasant smog can be. Perhaps the best solution to the Carbon emissions problem is to do our best to keep it as low as we can. How low do we need to go? The quantity of emissions needs to be balanced with the atmosphere’s ability to scrub those emissions from the air. If the input of Carbon into the atmosphere is less than the natural rate of removal, we should be okay. If Carbon emission input into the atmosphere exceeds nature’s rate of removal, we will make ourselves sicker. But nothing humanity does here has any overall effect on the planet’s temperature.
The thing that is really troubling about the Greenhouse Gas Theory is the unnecessary panic that it is causing among people. They respond to this panic by desperately seeking ways to save the Earth. The main direction they seem to be looking towards for a cure is to eliminate fossil fuel energy and convert to “renewable energy” such as wind power and solar power, and zero emission electric cars.
The problem is, all of those hoped for technologies and energy sources are hazardous, toxic and are actually not renewable at all. That is because they all totally depend upon the use of rechargeable batteries. Those batteries are made of very hazardous and non-renewable elements. Any hope that the recycling of all those batteries will prevent future environmental pollution problems from occurring is naïve. Such hopes will prove to be unreasonable fantasies. Just look to present day recycling results with plastics in order to determine what future recycling results with batteries will actually be.
One of the elements that presently seems to be a major component in battery construction is Lithium. It is #3 on the periodic table of elements and it is the lightest metal we know of. The mining of Lithium causes an ecological disaster to the area near the mine. Lithium is not found as big chunks of metal. It is dispersed throughout the underground rocks. Once the rocks are mined and brought to the surface, the Lithium must be extracted. The rest of the unwanted mined material is discarded.
The discarded material is full of various elements and compounds that are hazardous and they poison the surrounding environment. As the demand for Lithium increases, so will the mining increase, and so will the environmental damage increase. And, that damage may be virtually irreversible and will spread.
As for the Lithium itself, although it does exist in the salt water of the oceans, it is not commonly found in the land ecosystems or in fresh water. As the Lithium from discarded batteries seeps into our ecosystem, our ecology will become saturated by it. Once it gets into the water table, it may become impossible to get rid of it. Lithium toxicity can cause people to become severely ill with various major organ failures and malfunctions. The only cure is to eliminate the intake of Lithium. And, even so, recovery of one’s health could still take many years.
On the other hand, fossil fuels are totally natural and the Earth recycles them and their emissions easily. Plants are natures perfect and environmentally friendly batteries. They store the Sun’s energy and are 100% biodegradable. They are totally renewable (farming). Even the most enormous and disastrous oil spills are completely gone without a trace after just a few years. All the elements that combine to form plants are compatible with our ecosystem because those elements come from and naturally circulate within our ecosystem. The elements that make up batteries and mining waste are alien to our ecosystem and are not compatible with it. Digging up those elements from deep within the Earth and then introducing those elements into our ecosystem will totally disrupt it, poisoning it and us.
The poisoning of our planet’s surface with harmful elements from mining waste and from discarded man-made batteries that were not recycled properly will destroy our environment for ages to come, or perhaps even ruin it permanently. And, one can be confident in one fact: In order to save a dollar, or save a few minutes of time, people will ignore recycling and cause those batteries and the mining waste to most definitely be inappropriately dumped somewhere, poisoning our water tables and the entire environment. Worldwide prolific use of rechargeable batteries will ultimately result in the worldwide prolific spreading of deadly poisons across the entire surface of the Earth.
The perceived solutions to global warming are illogical and backwards, and here is an example of why that is so. It is a documented fact that whenever a large volcano erupts, global cooling follows. The volcano spews huge quantities of particles and gases (that scientists would identify as being greenhouse gases) into the atmosphere. Those particles and gases do not warm the Earth. Instead, those extra particles do the exact same thing that all of the other atmospheric particles do. They cause half of the Sun’s energy that strikes them to be sent back out into space. And so, the greater the concentration of particles that exist in the atmosphere, the greater the global cooling.
Mankind seeks to fight global warming by doing the opposite of what they should do. They struggle to reduce the number of particles in the atmosphere. They fail to realize that global warming is a natural occurrence and cannot be stopped. They fail to realize that the industrial emissions of this age have actually slowed down the natural progression of global warming instead of being the cause of it. If not for the industrial age, planetary temperatures would be even hotter than they are right now. Even so, slowing down global warming will not stop it from happening. If slowed too much, causing the energy difference between the ether and the Earth to grow too great, the energy would suddenly equalize with a jolt. Instead of a slow and gradual increase in temperatures, we would eventually experience a sudden jump in temperature.
Likewise, in their efforts to reduce greenhouse gases, people think that it will help if we switch to solar and wind power. However, methane is also one of the major culprits named in the Greenhouse Gas Theory. It stands to reason that, in order to reduce the quantity of methane in the atmosphere, we should burn more natural gas instead of less. Of course, burning methane creates more Carbon emissions and so would ultimately achieve nothing. Perhaps if we eliminate the life-forms which create Carbon emissions (such as livestock and people), then the global warming crisis will be averted. Obviously, the Greenhouse Gas Theory is not only absurd, but it is a dangerous and slippery slope!
The conversion of automobile power from gas to electric is going to have disastrous results. The problem goes beyond the poisoning that all those car batteries will ultimately inflict upon the ecology. Since global warming is not man-made, it will come despite all of our efforts to stop it. When the temperature rises, the demand upon the electrical infrastructure will increase. Everyone will want and need their air conditioners running. Even now, during hot days, the electrical infrastructure is hard pressed to meet the demand. The usage of electricity will be even greater as global warming peaks. Adding the energy demands of millions upon millions of automobiles to the already over-burdened electrical grid is the exact opposite of what we should be doing in order to prepare for the inevitable coming of global warming.
Science’s solution to global warming is seriously flawed. Not only is global warming a natural non-fatal phenomenon to which there is no solution, but the perceived solutions are the opposite of what we should do even if we could fight it at all. The reason science is so backwards about this is because the source of all their theories is Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. His theory is completely wrong and totally the opposite of the way the universe actually does work. As a result, so is the Greenhouse Gas Theory.
There is absolutely nothing that mankind can do to stop the annual coming of summer or the ensuing coming of winter. Likewise, there is nothing that mankind can do to stop the millennial coming of global warming or the ensuing coming of another ice age. But, in their valiant but futile efforts to do just that in order to “save the planet”, people will unwittingly poison themselves to death and poison this planet. And all of that will happen because science completely trusted in the impossible theories created within the dysfunctional mind of Einstein.
Chapter 15 - THE UNIFIED FORCE AND THE LAWS OF EVERYTHING
COPYRIGHT © 2017, By Jonathan P. Volkel
Scientists have long sought out the key to what makes everything tick. The “unified field theory” and “the theory of everything” are some of the titles given to this quest. But, they could never find the answer because they were asking the wrong question. The question “What do light, magnetism and gravity have in common?” is a faulty question. It implies that these forces are all different to start with. A better question is; “What does the MOTION of light, the MOTION of magnetism and the MOTION of gravity have in common?” Although a better question, it is an unnecessary question, because the answer is provided within the question itself. They are all MOTION. The best question is; “What is the DIFFERENCE between the motion of light, the motion of magnetism and the motion of gravity?” They are all the motion of photons which move at light speeds within the ether. The difference is in their frequencies. It is those different frequencies that manifest as different effects which we label as light, magnetism and gravity. When that motion is transferred from tiny photons into more massive atoms, the difference becomes frequency AND speed. This manifests as additional effects, such as electricity.
Scientists had always thought that an electron contained some mysterious inner force that emanated electrical energy. Likewise, they believed that the neutron contained some built in nature that caused it to emanate gravity waves. They believed that by physically breaking these components, their innermost energies could be released. To understand this error, compare it to a car engine. It is a commonplace thing which we build all the time. In that engine, the alternator provides the electrical power that runs the car. But the alternator itself is not electrical. Its design involves putting a coil of wires between magnets and spinning the coil to create electricity. Detach it from the car, and set it on the ground next to a household magnet, and all the electrical energy is gone. The magnet and it are no different.
The reason the alternator generates electricity is because it is connected to a motor. Even that isn’t enough. The motor has to be running and creating a spinning motion. Of course, you can’t connect it while the motor is running. You must build the motor first, and then start it up. Once running, some of the energy (inertia) of the spinning motor is directed to the alternator. Its unique configuration allows it to channel that energy and manifest it as electricity. The motor itself is, in a sense, completely useless. It will sit, motionless forever, even with a full tank of gas. To make it useful, you have to start it up. You have to insert motion into it.
In an atom, the electron is like the alternator of a motor. Its uses the spinning of the atom to create electricity. The neutron is like the drive train of the car. It redirects the spinning motion into linear direction. The proton is the cooling system for the whole thing. If that atomic motor were to stop spinning, the electron, proton and neutron would be inert and have no distinct properties one from another except for their size and shape. That is because they are all made out of the exact same thing: the photon. The only energy it contains is inertia in motion manifested as different effects because of different vibration frequencies.
Despite all the law abiding explanations that have been provided here, without a doubt, there are still those who are die hard skeptics. They will insist on clinging to what Einstein taught them. If you are one of those, are you really sure you understand what it is you are defending?
Do you really believe that a particle of energy can exist, disembodied from matter? If so, then what is it made of? What sustains its existence? What type of energy is it exactly? Why would something with no mass have a speed limit? Are you really 100% sure of, and comfortable with, time dilation? Can you define exactly what time is “made of” and by exactly what mechanism it is altered and how and why? Do you believe that gravity is not actually a force, but is rather something that bends space? What is space “made of” so that its substance can be bent? What is the nature, origin and composition of gravity that enables it to do that?
These are just some of the questions that must be answered in order to have complete confidence in your belief. If you know the answers to those questions, then you do well to stick to your beliefs. You should also publish those answers, because, at present, the world at large does not have a clear explanation for those answers. The proof of that is the very fact that the search for the Unifying force existed. Science fully realizes that the discovery of such a force would provide answers to all of those questions.
You may feel that all the scientific data fits the existing theories. But, don’t you realize that the theories were created in order to fit the data? Don’t you realize that every time a new phenomenon is discovered that doesn’t fit the data, a new theory is created in order to make it fit? Each and every one of those new theories ends up further complicating the known laws of science and nature. Perhaps you went down that path because you had no other choice. Without a suitable alternative explanation, your choices were either Einstein or nothing. But, if you do not have answers to all those previous questions, then why believe Einstein? You’d be far better off by simply admitting “I don’t know”.
Now, finally, you have before you a suitable alternative explanation. The first and foremost obstacle that you must overcome is that of disbelief in the existence of the ether. If you don’t believe in it, then ask yourself why. What further proof do you need? The experiment that proves that it exists and moves has been shown to you. It has even been shown how to see it with your own eyes. What more do you need?
If you do believe that the ether exists, then consider its purpose and function. It is the thing which enables all energy transfer to happen by propagation. It eliminates the concept of energy being disembodied from matter. It eliminates the concept of energy traveling through a vacuum. It explains the data that seems to indicate that space is stretching. It explains the true nature and function of gravity without having to use the mind boggling concept of bent space. It puts an end to all of Einstein’s theories that science clings to so tenaciously.
With the ether, the explanation of what energy is and how it moves and how it manifests is simple and easy. With the ether, not one single theory is needed in order to explain the known data. Only the most basic and simple laws of science are needed to explain all of it. All of the effects seen in nature are caused by the energy of objects in motion: it’s that simple. It is both an all encompassing and extremely simple explanation. What more could you possibly want?
Don’t you see that Einstein’s theories raise more questions than they answer? Doesn’t this unified force answer all questions and create no new ones? Even those questions which were not anticipated that might still remain will be addressed in the last two chapters. Don’t allow a less than perfect explanation of things to become a stumbling block for you. If something was not explained clearly, or a scientific principle was misunderstood, do not let that get in the way of seeing the truth of this. In fact, only true scientists will be able to help in analyzing and defining this whole thing right down to the tiniest vibration and frequency.
The unified force is inertia. But inertia does not reach its full potential unless it is in motion. Motion cannot exist unless it occupies an object, like a photon. That too is of no value unless you shape photons into components like neutrons, protons and electrons. Those components are also useless unless combined to make atoms. Atoms have the ability to redirect inertia in useful ways, but they don’t really help us unless they combine to form molecules. The cycle builds and builds. And none of it would work at all unless it operates in a fluid-like environment like the ether. Even imbalances in the atomic engine can be taken advantage of to create effects that make life possible. All of this is why this is about more than just “The Unified Force”. It is also fully embraces “The Laws of Everything”.
Chapter 16 - HOW IT HAPPENED
COPYRIGHT © 2017, By Jonathan P. Volkel
The previous chapters explained how the universe works. However, there is one immensely important question that still needs to be answered. It’s not good enough to simply declare the “what”. That is insufficient unless one can also explain the “how” and the “why”. The “how” will be addressed in this chapter. The “why” in the next chapter.
How could our universe possibly have come into existence? This question is even greater than the search for the Unified Force. In fact, it is perhaps the most important question in existence. As much as we may be convinced beyond any shadow of a doubt that the ether does exist and that it is the medium that allows energy to move back and forth throughout the entire universe via the simple process of mechanical propagation, it is still not enough. We still need to know “How did this all begin?”
Modern science has tried to answer that question by inventing the Big Bang Theory. It does not include the ether in its explanation, and it utilizes Einstein’s incorrect understanding of gravity and energy, and so it is totally incorrect. Gravity does not emanate from amidst the sub-atomic particles named “photons”. There is no gravity unless the photons are merged and fashioned into the atomic components that science has named “neutrons, protons and electrons”. Even they do not emanate gravitational forces unless they are assembled into the spinning engines called “atoms”. The ether provides the external force that holds the atoms together. It is the spinning of the atoms that creates a spray of sub-atomic photons that causes separate atoms to move towards one another.
What natural forces could possibly exist in nature that would direct the movement of the photons in the ether to combine in such a way as to result in the creation of the electron, then the proton and then the neutron? Where did the forces that might have caused this come from in the first place? Was the ether always spinning? Where did the all the photons that fill the ether come from? What made them move with the patterns of motion that they have?
Even if some imagined force caused all of the photons to move together, to the extent that they all headed together towards one spot in the universe, they would converge and collide. The nature of their behavior would cause them to "pass through" each other and then head outward again, away from one another, moving ever further apart into infinity. And where would such a force that could cause them to move originate from?
When considering the “how” of all of this, remember that there is only one force that can be used as a tool to generate it: F=ma (a force is a mass in motion). That force is the energy of motion infused within matter, causing that matter to move. And the laws of science prove that an object in motion cannot change its speed or direction unless acted upon by an EXTERNAL force (an external mass in motion). And so, some other force, greater than and outside of our universe, must have caused our universe to move as it does.
Imagine taking an automobile engine, disassembling it, and throwing all the pieces into a pile. What amount of the application of shaking, spinning, pounding, stirring, or any other random use of motion that can be imagined, would cause these parts to become re-assembled into an engine again? And where is the application of all of that external motion coming from? What could possibly cause that external force to continually change its speed and direction in such a precise way as to create the correct pattern that results in the proper assembly of the motor?
Scientists will inevitably speculate on how some theoretical mysterious force radiated outward from the center of the universe and was responsible for the innumerable changes in force necessary to assemble everything into the…(etc.). However, those types of desperate theories can be immediately rejected because they violate the basic laws of motion.
Well then, how did our universe happen? Criticism is not helpful unless the critic can also explain the correct answer. The truth is, no new explanation is needed. Mankind already knew long ago how our universe came into being. We already knew it because we have already heard it. The problem is, even though we heard it, we dismissed it because we didn’t understand it. We couldn’t understand it until now!
One can examine this from as many perspectives as their imagination, logic and common sense allows. The only rational conclusion that can be reached is that there is absolutely no way our universe could have evolved randomly on its own. IT WAS BUILT. There is no other plausible explanation. The design of it was crafted by an intelligence that has infinite capacity. The energy of motion imparted into our universe comes from an infinite source. This energy always existed and will always exist. It extends into every corner of existence and it exists everywhere at once. Another way of saying all of that is: It is all knowing, all powerful, eternal, infinite and omnipresent. These are the attributes of God.
Despite the un-deniability that the facts lead logically and solely to this conclusion, those who insist on political correctness will immediately have their feathers ruffled. How dare one allow the bringing of “religion” into a scientific discussion by throwing the impossible concept of God into the equation? That is one viewpoint. Perhaps the more correct viewpoint is; “How can one claim to have an open mind and yet remove God from the equation?” Isn’t creation plainly obvious? Isn’t it easy see the obvious errors in things like the Theory of Relativity and the Big Bang Theory? Doesn’t approximately 90% of the world already believe in God? They have good reason to!
No one should allow themselves to be bullied or brainwashed by closed minded intellectuals on a determined crusade to erase God. They have the right to be closed minded if they so choose. Don’t be blinded by them simply because they intimidate us with PhD’s and claims of superior knowledge and understanding. Chapter 14 demonstrates how those PhD’s have led science into a dead end. Each and every one of us needs to see the universe without their “help”, and thereby SEE GOD. He is always and ever in us, through us and around us. The tenor of this entire writing was not directed towards the PhD’s. It was directed at the average person. We all have eyes and ears and minds of our own. SEE! HEAR! KNOW!
Perhaps there is no better way to explain how the universe was created than to explain it in the way it has already been told from of old. From the very beginning, God has told us exactly how He created the universe. Thanks to an initial lack of understanding, and then Einstein’s misdirection, we were unable to understand what God was really saying. Now, we can know. The creation account in the book of Genesis is perhaps the most amazing and accurate description of how the universe came into being that one will ever hear.
Genesis 1:1 “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”
(God selected a section of space that the ether would exist in [the heavens]. The first thing that God created in that area was all the particles that fill it; the photons [the earth], and he placed all of them within the predetermined boundaries. We call the body of all of those particles “the ether”.)
1:2 “The earth was without form and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.”
(The photons within the ether had no energy of any kind. The entire ether ocean was completely motionless. God examined (hovered over) the ether and created a design for our universe. By referring to all of those particles as “the waters”, He reveals here that everything else that is subsequently created will be submerged within that body of particles. Not only that, but everything submerged in that body of particles will be affected in a way that is similar to how things submerged in water are affected [squeezed on all sides by an external pressure]. He also reveals that the physical consistency of all matter is that of a liquid.)
1:3 “Then God said “Let there be light”; and there was light.”
(God filled the photons with the energy of motion and caused them to move back and forth in random directions. Their spacing and speed caused them to bounce off of one another with a frequency and pattern that matches the bandwidth that we refer to as “light”. All the combined random patterns of motion of the individual photons caused the ether as a whole to vibrate.)
1:4 “And God saw the light, that is was good; and God divided the light from the darkness.”
(God ensured that the photons had the correct spacing between them and were filled with the perfect amount of inertia, and then created waves in the ether so that light began to move around in linear, straight-line directions, in all directions, throughout the entire universe. He caused the vibrating ether to also have directional patterns of motion, and in so doing, caused light to travel everywhere throughout the ether.)
1:5 “God called the light Day and the darkness He called Night. So the evening and the morning were the first day.”
1:6 “Then God said “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.””
(God established the boundaries within which our universe [which would contain photons assembled into atoms] would exist and divided it and separated it from the rest of the energized fluid-like photons in the ether ocean. After this, two separate ethers existed. He placed a dividing region between the two ethers, known as a firmament (expanse).)
1:7 “Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so.”
(And so, two separate ether oceans exist, each having its own and independent way of functioning. Our realm of matter, which would be composed of atoms immersed within the ether, is under the other realm, which [as far as we know] is composed only of photons. Both realms are separated from one another by an expanse.)
1:8 “And God called the firmament Heaven. So the evening and the morning were the second day.”
(The expanse between the two separate ethers was named “Heaven”)
1:9 “Then God said “Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear”; and it was so.”
(God caused the fluid-like photons within the lower realm of the ether to come together and form the shapes of matter. He made the electron, proton and neutron. He built atoms and molecules and attached them together. He started to build a single planet.)
1:10 “And God called the dry land Earth, and the gathering together of the waters He called Seas. And God saw that it was good.”
(Thus, the very first celestial object that God built within the ether was the planet Earth. God created water and filled the Earth with the exact amount needed for the project. He ensured that the Earth possessed exactly all of the necessary elements needed to support a self-replicating ecosystem.)
1:11 “Then God said “Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth.” And it was so.”
1:12 “And the earth brought forth grass, the herb that yields seed according to its kind, and the tree that yields fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.”
(God created plants of distinct kinds separate and distinct from other kinds. He gave them the ability to duplicate themselves within their own kind.)
1:13 “So the evening and the morning were the third day.”
1:14 “then God said “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years;”
1:15 ““and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth’”; and it was so.”
1:16 “Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser night to rule the night. He made the stars also.”
1:17 “God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth,”
1:18 “and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good.”
(God decided on the exact placement of all the celestial bodies. He made all the planets, stars and all the objects in space, and then the Sun and the Moon. Even though the stars were so very far away, He caused their light [vibrating patterns of motion] to be already reaching Earth. He set all the objects moving and spinning at the absolutely perfect speed to make the system work and to create the perfect rotational conditions needed to maintain life on the Earth. He made the Earth spin to regulate day and night. He “started the engine”. At this point, everything could now function on its own without intervention from Him.)
1:19 “So the evening and the morning were the fourth day.”
1:20 “Then God said, “Let the waters abound with an abundance of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the face of the firmament of the heavens.””
1:21 “So God created great sea creatures and every living thing that moves, with which the waters abounded, according to their kind, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.”
1:22 “And God blessed them saying, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth.””
(After the whole system was up and running, a different kind of object could be added in; objects more “delicate” than inanimate things. God made living creatures. They were creatures that had life and could move in directions of their own choosing rather than just things imprisoned by the natural forces of inertia. He created specific individual species of distinct kinds which reproduced only according to their kind. He balanced the ecosystem to the perfect conditions and designed the sea creatures that they would reproduce in great numbers. He made creatures that would not only move, but fly. He made them in many different species and gave them abundant reproductive traits.)
1:23 “So the evening and the morning were the fifth day.”
1:24 “Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind”, and it was so.”
1:25 “And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind, cattle according to its kind, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.”
(God made the remaining creatures. He made them according to distinct species and gave them the ability to reproduce with their own kind. He gave them life so that they could choose for themselves to move rather than be subject to the movements dictated by the natural forces of inertia.)
1:26 “Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.””
(Then God created man. The life energy of all the other creatures is that of the inertia that comes from within this universe. Man’s life energy will be infused with a special kind of inertia that comes from the makeup of God Himself. Man will have a vibration capacity that is directly compatible with God’s. Man will be given intelligence above all other created things.)
1:27 “So God created man in his own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them...”
...1:31 “Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good. So the evening and the morning were the sixth day.”
The above description of what our universe is and the sequence in which it was built is the only possible plausible scientific explanation for how our universe came into being. It is FAR better than the scientifically impossible Big Bang Theory.
To better understand this, compare our universe to a simple gasoline powered engine. In order for the engine to run, a spark is needed to ignite the fuel. The exploding fuel pushes a piston and creates motion in the engine. The engines motion generates the next spark. In simplest terms, the spark leads to the engine’s motion, and the engine’s motion leads to the spark. So then, which came first? The spark, or the motion?
Obviously, the engine can not have begun the process on its own. An external force is needed in order to get the whole thing started. Once running, it will continue to do so as long as the fuel lasts. In order to start the process, motion must be inserted from an external source. And so, pulling the starter cord inserts the original motion, which then creates the first spark, and on it goes.
The workings of our universe possess a similar dilemma. Atoms spin within the ether ocean. The spinning motion creates an endless stream of waves that propagate through the particles of the ether. Because atoms are scattered throughout the entire universe, they create waves that move back-and-forth and crisscross one another. This results in the photons possessing an overall random pattern of back-and-forth motion. It is that random photon motion that bombards the surface of all the atoms within the ether. It is that photon bombardment which applies an all-encompassing external force upon all the atoms immersed in the ether. It is that back-and-forth motion that causes the ether to create an effect upon objects similar to the effect upon objects submerged under water. It is that external force which keeps the spinning atoms from simply flying apart in obedience to Newton’s first law of motion.
In simplest terms, the random patterns of motion of the photons allows the atoms to stay intact while spinning, and the spinning atoms create the random patterns of motion of the photons. So then, which came first? If the atoms started spinning first, then they would fly apart long before any back-and-forth random patterns of motion could be established. The only way that this system could work was if the photons had their motion first. Then and only then could spinning objects be inserted into the ether and stay intact. Once inserted, they could continue to spin without flying apart and would cause the creation of waves which travelled in every direction and would perpetuate the back-and-forth photon motion.
If the atoms did not and could not provide the initial motion of the photons, then where did that motion come from? The Genesis account of creation indeed describes the perfect sequence of events necessary to build our universe. In simplest terms, it was God who “pulled the starter cord” by getting the photons to move first.
The Big Bang Theory is completely impossible. It requires belief in too many concepts that are not based in reality. In order to accept that theory, one must believe that time and space are objects that can be altered and even completely erased. Not only that, but one must accept that energy can exist as a mass-less particle, be a mass-less force, and that it can cause the creation of time, space and matter. One must also completely disregard Newton’s laws of motion and accept that an explosion radiating outward from a central point could somehow magically transform into spinning motion without the application of an external force. The entire theory is so bad, it should be completely beneath notice.
The Genesis account of creation is not only an accurate description of our universe, but it defines God as being the external force responsible for its creation. That account was written over three thousand years ago by Moses. How could he have possibly known about the ether and its particles? Did he know about how various vibrating patterns of matter in motion manifest as light? Did he know that light was the result of the mechanical propagation of waves? Did he even understand concepts like “propagation”? Did he know that everything in the universe was spinning and affecting us here? Even until this day, modern science did not even know that these are the forces at work in everything within our universe. How did Moses know to write these things? To this day, no one knew what the phrase “The Spirit of God was over the face of the waters” meant. Ether currents demonstrate that the ether behaves like a liquid. How did Moses know that all of space was filled with particles that behave like an ocean? There is only one way that he could have possibly known these things. God told him.
One very amazing, and perhaps most profound thing of all, is that the Earth was built and established first, and every other celestial object in the universe was built around it and for US! We are at the one single place in space where all the spinning motion in the universe combines to create one particular cumulative spin rate that is exactly perfect. It is that spin rate which causes our DNA to possess the double helix corkscrew shape that it has.
In other places of the universe, the spin rate is slower and larger assemblies of atomic components become impossible. In those places, DNA would start to unwind. Some places spin faster and thereby also drastically alter the periodic table of elements, as well as cause an increase in gravity and radiation. The forces and energies that we are familiar with here would not behave the same way there. Elements would have completely different characteristics. The DNA double helix would become tighter and more wound up. And, whether wound too tight, or too loose, DNA will start to become unstable and replicate incorrectly.
The Earth was designed and constructed to be the one and only spot in the universe that had conditions perfect enough to support life. The position of our galaxy in the universe, combined with the position of our Sun in the galaxy, both contribute a big influence to the spin rate. The position of the Earth from the Sun and the exact spin rate of the Earth combine to create the last little bits of fine rotational tuning that give this one and only place the exact speed needed in order to build atoms perfectly and support life. The present tilt of the Earth causes it to wobble and has given our atoms a built-in instability of oscillation which causes our DNA to destabilize a bit. This manifests to us as an effect that we call “aging”.
The entire universe was built for us so that atoms would function perfectly here and only here! The fact that we age indicates a lack of absolute perfection due to the presence of an imbalance. If the Earth had no tilt, then it would not wobble. As a result, DNA would be much more stable and the aging process would slow down considerably. Such conditions would make this Earth a virtual paradise!
The Genesis account indicates that at one time the Earth actually was a paradise and people did live much longer. The fossil record reveals dinosaurs grew to an immense size. Reptiles grow every year that they live. It is possible that the huge size of dinosaurs indicates that they may actually gotten so large simply because they had lived for many, many centuries. The only thing that could have altered those paradise-like conditions would be a huge cataclysm. The cataclysm would have to be an event that would tilt the Earth into its present state, and result in a drastic change in climate. Not only does Genesis indicate such an event, but it also reveals that afterwards, the ages of people started to decline drastically.
Scientists refuse to accept Noah’s flood as being an explanation for the fossil record. These are also the same people who accept the Big Bang Theory as being valid. As such, they try to forcibly interpret the fossil records to fit their theories. The Big Bang Theory is completely wrong, and so is the scientist’s declarations about the history of the Earth.
What does acceptance of the Genesis account of creation, in regards to the true workings of the universe, mean to us? There is so much to soak in. There are both profound and mundane concepts to consider. For starters, there is nothing wrong with space exploration, as long as it is done remotely. Deep space probes are made up of much less complicated arrangements of atoms than the DNA within our bodies. Even so, probes will slowly disintegrate the further and further they get from Earth. For people to travel too far away from Earth is suicide. The farther one gets from Earth; the more ones DNA will be adversely affected. Even the concept of sustaining life on Mars is an impossibility.
This also means that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ALIENS!!! If someone were to argue that alien life existed in the extremely unbalanced environments that exist beyond Earth, realize that such arguments are ridiculous and completely lacking in any scientific credibility. No lifeform could survive anywhere else but here.
Science never really understood why we aged. Oscillation in atoms creates an imbalance in the complex structure of DNA. Very slowly, one by one, pieces move incorrectly and misalign, causing them to disconnect from the system and replicate incorrectly. Reproducing with someone that has that missing piece can restore the full original blueprint. Reproducing with someone who is missing the same piece of DNA will result in offspring also missing that same piece. Since every person’s DNA is different, then different pieces come off of different people’s DNA at different times. Broadening the scope of reproduction improves the chances the missing pieces will be restored to the original design. Inbreeding ensures that missing pieces will never be restored.
DNA can NEVER become more complex. It can only be restored to its original capacity or it can break down. Despite the life sustaining environment here on Earth, DNA still breaks down. Imagine an environment on another planet with even worse oscillations and spinning imbalances. Even the periodic table of elements could be drastically altered in those places.
And what obvious conclusion does that lead to? THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS EVOLUTION! Obviously, the Theory of Evolution is as impossible as The Big Bang Theory. The science and laws of nature prove it. Random additions to DNA by some sort of evolutionary process would not and could not work. It would require the equivalent amount of input of energy needed to create something like an alloy.
To create an alloy, massive infusions of heat are needed to cause the speeds of different atoms to match up. Successful pairings of different elements result in alloys, such as brass or bronze. What would such heat infusions do to a living thing? What if the “alloy” doesn’t blend properly? In either case, the whole system would crash, and the creature would die. If so-called evolutionary processes were at work, all living things would quickly become extinct. The only way that DNA can become more complex is by a massive infusion of inertia into the system so that it can accommodate the extra load the added complex molecules demand. Such spontaneous, non-destructive massive infusions of inertia only fall into the category of a phenomenon that we call “a miracle”.
God created this universe for one and only one purpose: US! The entire universe was created exactly the way it is just so that the spin here would be perfect so that life could exist here. All of the galaxies and objects in space exist in the specific locations that they do, and move as they do, solely so that the Earth could function as it does. We are the entire reason why creation exists. We are incredibly important to God. HE LOVES US!
If someone were to try to present some theory on how all of creation came together “on its own”, be wary! There are no known forces that could possibly account for such an explanation, and there are no unknown and as yet undiscovered forces “out there” either. Whatever forces affect the ether also affect all of the atoms. And whatever forces affect the atom affects us. If we haven’t seen its effects yet, it’s because such a force doesn’t exist.
Chapter 17 - THE MEANING OF IT ALL
COPYRIGHT © 2017, By Jonathan P. Volkel
The processes unveiled herein are both remarkable and disconcerting. On the one hand, an intricate perpetual motion system is seen. The laws of thermodynamics tell us that energy is never lost, only transferred. Once motion exists in the system, it will always exist. The natural workings of things would indicate that all energy would keep spreading out until it was evenly dispersed throughout all of space. Inevitably, our universe must fly apart and spread out everywhere. It would seem that different photons carry different quantities of energy which move in different directions. When two photons collide, they swap their energy. Because of this, since all photons do not possess the same energy right now, there could never be a situation where all photons eventually do come to possess the same energy. There does not seem to be any natural process that would either drain the energy out of the photons or cause them to all to become equal in energy.
Not only are atoms and the whole system of their energy transferal amazing, but the effects caused by particular arrangements of atoms are a great marvel. It is a self-balancing system. Then, the changes in effects caused by combinations of atoms into molecules are even more astounding. Then, the complexity of the results of combining them to create DNA and living creatures is a process too intricate for us to even imagine. The creation is a work far beyond the ability of any level of intelligence that we can comprehend. When viewed as a whole, it is a wondrous miracle. It is so intricate, precise and complex, it becomes difficult for our finite minds to comprehend and accept.
When viewed in the minutest detail, all we see is dust. The ether is swirling around like some incredibly thick dust storm. Our very bodies are trading places with those particles moment by moment. When you move, or the ether moves, you become made up of an entirely different group of photon particles. The physical material that makes up your body is different now than it was a moment ago. That thought can be very unsettling. This brings us back to that very important question that demands an answer. “Are we moving or is it the ether?” Does it really make a difference? YES!!! It is the only relevant question in all of existence!!! It is the only real question that matters. Am I moving, or is the universe moving me?
What is it that makes such a thought so troubling? It’s not the science of it all that is troubling. That aspect of it makes perfect sense. The source of the problem comes from such thoughts as these. “Who cares about how the universe works? Who cares whether the math works or not? What I really need to know is: What am I? Why am I? What is it that makes me "ME"?” And so, for each and every one of us, the biggest question of all in the entire universe is: “Is that all we are? Was the song correct? Is it true that all we are is dust in the wind?” It is a question that needs to be answered.
Gen 3:19 “For dust you are, and to dust you shall return.”
Gen 18:27 “Then Abraham answered and said “Indeed now, I who am but dust and ashes…””
But those are just references to our physical bodies. They are elaborate machines built from the most basic machines which are the atoms, which in turn are made from the dust of the universe; photons. Those bodies are indeed made from the dust of the ether and shall return there. However, the life that is within us is far, far more than that.
Gen 2:7 “And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.”
There is a difference between being a robot and being alive. A machine can do all kinds of wondrous things. It can even be made to mimic the behavior of life. But it is not alive. Look again at the Genesis creation account at the place where trees were created. Nowhere does it say that life was given to them. They are just immensely intricate machines which were “brought forth from the earth”. They are made out of parts fashioned from the dust of the ether. They copy the behavior of living things, but are not themselves alive.
Being alive is a special thing. It is a life force that functions independent of interaction with external inertial forces. Scientifically it seems impossible. That is why it can be referred to as “the miracle of life”. A life force is something created, sustained, and held in place by God. We are more than just our bodies and its functions. Our bodies are affected by nature, but “who we are” is very different than that. We are not alive because of our bodies. Our bodies are alive because we occupy them.The proof of that is in what happens to our bodies when we leave them; when we die. We did not evolve like some ever more and more complicated machine. WE ARE ALIVE!
But that isn’t even enough to ease the discomfort that this whole picture creates within us. We are alive, but so are the animals. How are we any different than them?
Gen 1:27 “So God created man in His own image.”
God took a little part of Himself and made our life force out of that. We are different than the animals. Their life comes from the energies of this universe. Our life comes from the energies of God Himself. When an animal is killed, for whatever reason, it is just simply classified as killing. Only a human can be murdered, because it is an attack on God Himself.
We are His. We are part of Him and belong to Him. In the deepest parts of our subconscious, we have always known it. He loves us so very much because we are a piece of Him.
This relationship between man and God can be compared to the workings of an atom. God designed this universe exactly the way it is for that very purpose: so that we may see and know and understand our relationship with Him revealed to us through the creation. The electron and the neutron are not directly connected to one another, but they are connected through the proton. Although the energies within each component are different, they are nevertheless united into one great inertial force through the intermediary.
Rom 1:20 “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse…”
By looking at the things that are made, we can begin to understand His eternal power and deity. God created this system as a model which represents not only who He is, but also His relationship with us. He is like the electron, His “bandwidth” far above us. We are like the neutron. He has provided a bridge that can connect us to Him.
Finally, after all these millennia, God has decided that the time has come to reveal Himself to the world. His essence is so immense, He cannot show up in person without obliterating this realm. He used just the tiniest portion of His own life force to energize the entire ether. Imagine the result if He, in all His power, came into physical contact with the ether. It would be like setting of a nuclear bomb in a fish bowl. He is doing the next best thing to showing up in Person.
He has released the “blueprints” of His creation. He has now proven that He is, and He calls to us. He has revealed to mankind at this time that there is but one Book that tells the truth. Through that Book, He has been trying to tell us who He is for thousands of years. That same Book is the only book that ever held the true story. That Book holds all the answers for man. It shows the full story of how we were created, how we got separated from Him, and the way back to Him. He has kept it intact for thousands of years so that today, we can look at it, see the truths it holds, and know that He is speaking to us through it. There is no more need for guesswork. No more need for simple “blind” faith. He has shown you right where He is, and you now know what to read in order to find out what He is saying. You now have all the proof that you need. As of now, we are all without an excuse. He is calling out, loud and clear to the entire world. “Your time is running out. Choose a side!”
How much time remains? No one knows. Life is so very fleeting. Who can guess what tomorrow may have in store for us. The best advice that can be given is that which was already given by God Himself.
Heb 3:15 “Today if you will hear His voice, do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion.”
He is calling. He is calling RIGHT NOW! Seek Him.Turn to Him. GO TO HIM… TODAY!
TOP OF PAGE